Thunder Studios, Inc. v. Charif Kazal et al
Filing
192
JUDGMENT AFTER JURY VERDICT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: Plaintiff Thunder Studios shall have and recover $2,600.00 in statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. Section 504(c)(2) on Claim 1 (Copyright Infri ngement) against Defendant Charif Kazal. Plaintiff Thunder Studios shall take nothing on Claim 1 (Copyright Infringement) against Defendants Tony Kazal and Adam Kazal. Plaintiff Rodric David shall have and recover $100,000.00 in compensatory dam ages and $1,000,000.00 in punitive damages on Claim 2 (Stalking) against Defendant Tony Kazal. Plaintiff Rodric David shall have and recover $100,000.00 in compensatory damages and $1,000,000.00 in punitive damages on Claim 2 (Stalking ) against Defendant Adam Kazal. Plaintiff Rodric David shall take nothing on Claim 2 (Stalking) against Defendant Charif Kazal. Plaintiff Thunder Studios, Inc. may file a Motion For Recovery of Attorneys' Fees and Costs with the Court. Defendants Tony Kazal and Adam Kazal may file a Motion for Recovery of Attorneys' Fees with the Court. Plaintiffs Thunder Studios, Inc. and Rodric David may file an Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
THUNDER STUDIOS, INC.;
RODRIC DAVID,
11
12
13
14
15
Plaintiffs,
v.
CHARIF KAZAL; TONY KAZAL;
ADAM KAZAL; AND DOES 1 TO
100, INCLUSIVE,
16
CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00871 AB (SSx)
Hon. Andre Birotte, Jr.
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AFTER
JURY VERDICT
Verdict Rendered December 11, 2018
Defendants.
17
18
TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES, THE PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF
19
RECORD:
20
By reason of Special Verdict Form (Doc. Nos. 187 and 188) and Special Verdict
21
Form Punitive Damages (Doc. Nos. 189 and 190), which are incorporated herein by
22
reference, Plaintiffs Thunder Studios, Inc. and Rodric David are entitled to Judgment
23
against Defendants Charif Kazal, Tony Kazal and Adam Kazal. Now, therefore, it is
24
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
25
1.
Plaintiff Thunder Studios shall have and recover Two Thousand Six
26
Hundred Dollars ($2,600.00) in statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c)(2) on
27
Claim 1 (Copyright Infringement) against Defendant Charif Kazal.
28
2.
Plaintiff Thunder Studios shall take nothing on Claim 1 (Copyright
-1_____________________________________________________________________
Judgment
1
2
Infringement) against Defendants Tony Kazal and Adam Kazal.
3.
Plaintiff Rodric David shall have and recover One Hundred Thousand
3
Dollars ($100,000.00) in compensatory damages and One Million Dollars
4
($1,000,000.00) in punitive damages on Claim 2 (Stalking) against Defendant Tony
5
Kazal.
6
4.
Plaintiff Rodric David shall have and recover One Hundred Thousand
7
($100,000.00) in compensatory damages and One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) in
8
punitive damages on Claim 2 (Stalking) against Defendant Adam Kazal.
9
5.
Plaintiff Rodric David shall take nothing on Claim 2 (Stalking) against
10
Defendant Charif Kazal.
11
Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
1.
Plaintiff Thunder Studios, Inc. may file a Motion For Recovery of
Attorneys’ Fees and Costs with the Court.
2.
Defendants Tony Kazal and Adam Kazal may file a Motion for Recovery of
Attorneys’ Fees with the Court.
3.
Plaintiffs Thunder Studios, Inc. and Rodric David may file an Application to
the Clerk to Tax Costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated: 1/2/2019
20
_____________________________
André Birotte, Jr.
United States District Court Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Submitted by:
Seth W. Wiener (California State Bar No. 203747)
LAW OFFICES OF SETH W. WIENER
609 Karina Court
San Ramon, CA 94582
Telephone: (925) 487-5607
Email: seth@sethwienerlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Thunder Studios, Inc. and Rodric David
-2_____________________________________________________________________
Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?