Thunder Studios, Inc. v. Charif Kazal et al

Filing 192

JUDGMENT AFTER JURY VERDICT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: Plaintiff Thunder Studios shall have and recover $2,600.00 in statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. Section 504(c)(2) on Claim 1 (Copyright Infri ngement) against Defendant Charif Kazal. Plaintiff Thunder Studios shall take nothing on Claim 1 (Copyright Infringement) against Defendants Tony Kazal and Adam Kazal. Plaintiff Rodric David shall have and recover $100,000.00 in compensatory dam ages and $1,000,000.00 in punitive damages on Claim 2 (Stalking) against Defendant Tony Kazal. Plaintiff Rodric David shall have and recover $100,000.00 in compensatory damages and $1,000,000.00 in punitive damages on Claim 2 (Stalking ) against Defendant Adam Kazal. Plaintiff Rodric David shall take nothing on Claim 2 (Stalking) against Defendant Charif Kazal. Plaintiff Thunder Studios, Inc. may file a Motion For Recovery of Attorneys' Fees and Costs with the Court. Defendants Tony Kazal and Adam Kazal may file a Motion for Recovery of Attorneys' Fees with the Court. Plaintiffs Thunder Studios, Inc. and Rodric David may file an Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 THUNDER STUDIOS, INC.; RODRIC DAVID, 11 12 13 14 15 Plaintiffs, v. CHARIF KAZAL; TONY KAZAL; ADAM KAZAL; AND DOES 1 TO 100, INCLUSIVE, 16 CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00871 AB (SSx) Hon. Andre Birotte, Jr. [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AFTER JURY VERDICT Verdict Rendered December 11, 2018 Defendants. 17 18 TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES, THE PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF 19 RECORD: 20 By reason of Special Verdict Form (Doc. Nos. 187 and 188) and Special Verdict 21 Form Punitive Damages (Doc. Nos. 189 and 190), which are incorporated herein by 22 reference, Plaintiffs Thunder Studios, Inc. and Rodric David are entitled to Judgment 23 against Defendants Charif Kazal, Tony Kazal and Adam Kazal. Now, therefore, it is 24 ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 25 1. Plaintiff Thunder Studios shall have and recover Two Thousand Six 26 Hundred Dollars ($2,600.00) in statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c)(2) on 27 Claim 1 (Copyright Infringement) against Defendant Charif Kazal. 28 2. Plaintiff Thunder Studios shall take nothing on Claim 1 (Copyright -1_____________________________________________________________________ Judgment 1 2 Infringement) against Defendants Tony Kazal and Adam Kazal. 3. Plaintiff Rodric David shall have and recover One Hundred Thousand 3 Dollars ($100,000.00) in compensatory damages and One Million Dollars 4 ($1,000,000.00) in punitive damages on Claim 2 (Stalking) against Defendant Tony 5 Kazal. 6 4. Plaintiff Rodric David shall have and recover One Hundred Thousand 7 ($100,000.00) in compensatory damages and One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) in 8 punitive damages on Claim 2 (Stalking) against Defendant Adam Kazal. 9 5. Plaintiff Rodric David shall take nothing on Claim 2 (Stalking) against 10 Defendant Charif Kazal. 11 Attorneys’ Fees and Costs 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1. Plaintiff Thunder Studios, Inc. may file a Motion For Recovery of Attorneys’ Fees and Costs with the Court. 2. Defendants Tony Kazal and Adam Kazal may file a Motion for Recovery of Attorneys’ Fees with the Court. 3. Plaintiffs Thunder Studios, Inc. and Rodric David may file an Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs. IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: 1/2/2019 20 _____________________________ André Birotte, Jr. United States District Court Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Submitted by: Seth W. Wiener (California State Bar No. 203747) LAW OFFICES OF SETH W. WIENER 609 Karina Court San Ramon, CA 94582 Telephone: (925) 487-5607 Email: seth@sethwienerlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Thunder Studios, Inc. and Rodric David -2_____________________________________________________________________ Judgment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?