Thunder Studios, Inc. v. Charif Kazal et al

Filing 37

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S . 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before July 12, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) respon se. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant withi n 90 days after the complaint is filed. Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint on the following Defendant(s): Adam Kazal Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within the 90 day deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do so. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). IT IS SO ORDERED. (clee)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No.:

Title:

CV 17-00871-AB (SSx)

Date:

June 28, 2017

Thunder Studios, Inc. v. Charif Kazal et al

Present: The Honorable

ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge

Carla Badirian

N/A

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):

Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):

None Appearing

None Appearing

Proceedings:

[In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of
Prosecution

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution.
Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution
on its own motion).
The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before July 12, 2017,
why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument.
The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond
to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.
Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the
summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant within 90 days after the complaint
is filed. Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the
Complaint on the following Defendant(s): Adam Kazal

Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within the 90 day
deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do so. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

IT IS SO ORDERED.
CV-90 (12/02)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Initials of Deputy Clerk CB