Jocelli Pivaral-Agreda et al v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
Filing
50
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 49 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012)
JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551)
MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541)
RIGHETTIź˛¸GLUGOSKI, P.C.
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 983-0900
Facsimile: (415) 397-9005
JS-6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jocelly Pivaral-Agreda and Ricardo Moreno
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838)
EMILY ERDMAN (Cal. State Bar No. 301462)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
101 California Street, 48th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 856-7000
Facsimile: (415) 856-7100
jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
emilyerdman@paulhastings.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
20
JOCELLY PIVARAL-AGREDA, and
MAHAMMAD KHALIL,
Plaintiffs,
21
22
23
24
vs.
RITE AID CORPORATION, and
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.
25
No. 2:17-CV-00976-MWF-JEM
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE
Judge:
Dept.:
Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald
5A
Complaint Filed: November 15, 2016
Trial Date:
August 21, 2018
26
27
28
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
U.S.D.C. C.D. CAL. No. 2:17-CV-00976-MWF-JEM
LEGAL_US_W # 93512803.1
1
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,
2
IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH
3
PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneysā€™ fees.
4
5
6
7
Dated: April 11, 2018.
Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
U.S.D.C. C.D. CAL. No. 2:17-CV-00976-MWF-JEM
LEGAL_US_W # 93512803.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?