Jocelli Pivaral-Agreda et al v. Rite Aid Corporation et al

Filing 50

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 49 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012)
JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551)
MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541)
RIGHETTIꞏGLUGOSKI, P.C.
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

JS-6

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jocelly Pivaral-Agreda and Ricardo Moreno
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838)
EMILY ERDMAN (Cal. State Bar No. 301462)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
101 California Street, 48th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19
20

JOCELLY PIVARAL-AGREDA, and
MAHAMMAD KHALIL,
Plaintiffs,

21
22
23
24

vs.
RITE AID CORPORATION, and
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.

25

No. 2:17-CV-00976-MWF-JEM
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE
Judge:
Dept.:

Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald
5A

Complaint Filed: November 15, 2016
Trial Date:
August 21, 2018

26
27
28
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
U.S.D.C. C.D. CAL. No. 2:17-CV-00976-MWF-JEM
LEGAL_US_W # 93512803.1

1

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,

2

IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH

3

PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

4
5
6
7

Dated: April 11, 2018.
Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
U.S.D.C. C.D. CAL. No. 2:17-CV-00976-MWF-JEM
LEGAL_US_W # 93512803.1