Yamato Holdings Co. LTD. et al v. Anxin Wood Products Corp. et al
Filing
19
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. On March 3, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and noticed a hearing for April 10, 2017 13 . Per Central District of California Local Rule 7-9, Defendant's opposition t o the motion was due twenty-one days prior to the April 10, 2017 hearing. Defendant did not submit an opposition by that date. Therefore, the Court orders Defendant to show cause by March 30, 2017, why the motion should be not granted as unopposed pursuant to Central District Local Rule 7-12. (lom)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
United States District Court
Central District of California
8
9
10
11
YAMATO HOLDINGS COMPANY
12
LTD; YAMATO TRANSPORT USA,
13
INC.,
Case № 2:17-cv-01045-ODW (SK)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
ANXIN WOOD PRODUCTS
17
CORPORATION; GANG SONG; and
18
DOES 1–5, inclusive,
Defendants.
19
20
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
On March 3, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and
2
noticed a hearing for April 10, 2017. (ECF No. 13.) Per Central District of California
3
Local Rule 7-9, Defendant’s opposition to the motion was due twenty-one days prior
4
to the April 10, 2017 hearing. Defendant did not submit an opposition by that date.
5
Therefore, the Court orders Defendant to show cause by March 30, 2017, why the
6
motion should be not granted as unopposed pursuant to Central District Local Rule 7-
7
12.
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 24, 2017
11
12
13
14
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?