Yamato Holdings Co. LTD. et al v. Anxin Wood Products Corp. et al

Filing 19

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. On March 3, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and noticed a hearing for April 10, 2017 13 . Per Central District of California Local Rule 7-9, Defendant's opposition t o the motion was due twenty-one days prior to the April 10, 2017 hearing. Defendant did not submit an opposition by that date. Therefore, the Court orders Defendant to show cause by March 30, 2017, why the motion should be not granted as unopposed pursuant to Central District Local Rule 7-12. (lom)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court Central District of California 8 9 10 11 YAMATO HOLDINGS COMPANY 12 LTD; YAMATO TRANSPORT USA, 13 INC., Case № 2:17-cv-01045-ODW (SK) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 ANXIN WOOD PRODUCTS 17 CORPORATION; GANG SONG; and 18 DOES 1–5, inclusive, Defendants. 19 20 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 On March 3, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and 2 noticed a hearing for April 10, 2017. (ECF No. 13.) Per Central District of California 3 Local Rule 7-9, Defendant’s opposition to the motion was due twenty-one days prior 4 to the April 10, 2017 hearing. Defendant did not submit an opposition by that date. 5 Therefore, the Court orders Defendant to show cause by March 30, 2017, why the 6 motion should be not granted as unopposed pursuant to Central District Local Rule 7- 7 12. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. March 24, 2017 11 12 13 14 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?