Michael Kors, L.L.C. v. M R Enterprises et al

Filing 38

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS ANSWER SHOULD NOT BE STRICKEN by Judge Manuel L. Real. On 5/26/2017, Defendant Deepak Narula filed Answers to the First Amended Complaint on behalf of M R Enterprises. According to Local Rule 83-2.2.2., "only individuals may represent themselves pro se." IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that each party show cause as to why Defendant's Answer should not be stricken in violation of Local Rule 83-2.2.2, on or before 7/28/2017. (gk)

1
2
3

NO

JS-6

4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

MICHAEL KORS, L.L.C., a Delaware
Limited Liability Corporation,

14

Plaintiff,

15
v.

16
17

M R ENTERPRISES, an unknown business
entity; DOES 1-10, inclusive,

18

Defendants.

19
20
21

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:17-cv-01052-R-AS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFENDANT’S ANSWER SHOULD
NOT BE STRICKEN

22
23

On May 26, 2017, Defendant Deepak Narula filed Answers to the First Amended

24

Complaint on behalf of M R Enterprises. According to Local Rule 83-2.2.2., “only individuals

25

may represent themselves pro se.” Organizations, “including corporations, limited liability

26

corporations, partnerships, limited liability partnerships, unincorporated associations, and trusts”

27

may not appear in any action “unless represented by an attorney permitted to practice before this

28

Court.

1
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that each party show cause as to why Defendant’s Answer
should not be stricken in violation of Local Rule 83-2.2.2, on or before July 28, 2017.

3
4

Dated: July 21, 2017.

5
6
7
8

___________________________________
MANUEL L. REAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2