George Luk et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
Filing
19
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STAY 14 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The scheduled hearing on the motion to stay is hereby vacated and taken off calendar. The Parties are ORDERED to submit a joint status report, in writing, within 14 days of the resolution of the Writ of Mandamus in state court. (lc). Modified on 7/12/2017 (lc).
O
1
2
3
4
5
United States District Court
Central District of California
6
7
8
9
10
11
GEORGE LUK, individually and d/b/a/
333 LIVE; and L.A. ENTERTAINMENT
CENTER, INC.,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case № 2:17-cv-01091-ODW (KSx)
ORDER GRANTING
Plaintiffs,
v.
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY
[14]
CITY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS
ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT;
ROBERT BERUMEN; DANA HARRIS;
BRIAN PRATT; and DOES 1 through
100, inclusive,
Defendants.
On May 30, 2017, Defendants in this case filed a motion to stay the action
pending the outcome of Plaintiffs’ Writ of Mandamus in the California Superior
Court, County of Los Angeles. (ECF No. 14.) In the motion, Defendants indicated
that Plaintiffs did not intend to file an opposition. (Id.) The due date for any such
opposition, July 3, 2017, has since passed, and the Court has not received any
response from Plaintiffs. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-9. As such, and for good cause
appearing, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to stay the case pending the
outcome of Plaintiff’s Writ of Mandamus. (ECF No. 14.) The scheduled hearing on
the motion to stay is hereby vacated and taken off calendar.
The parties are
1
ORDERED to submit a joint status report, in writing, within 14 days of the
2
resolution of the Writ of Mandamus in state court.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 11, 2017
7
8
9
10
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?