Denise Serrano v. Target Corporation et al

Filing 19

ORDER On Joint Stipulation Re: Dismissal With Prejudice 18 by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell that Plaintiff Denise Serrano voluntarily dismisses, with prejudice, all of her claims against all parties including, but not limited to those alleged i n her Complaint against Defendant. The Court shall have continuing jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the provisions of the settlement and release agreement executed by the parties. The parties will each bear their own costs and attorneys fees associated with this action. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (jp)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
MANDANA MASSOUMI, (SBN 191359)
[e-mail]
MATTHEW B. GOLPER, (SBN 275979)
[e-mail]
695 Town Center Drive, 14th Floor
Costa Mesa, California 92626-1924
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
TARGET CORPORATION

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8
9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DENISE SERRANO, an individual,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15
16
17

v.

CASE NO: 2:17-cv-01130-BRO (AJWx)
Judge: Hon. Beverly Reid O’Connell
(LACS Case No. BC642867)

TARGET CORPORATION, a
Minnesota corporation; and DOES 1
through 20, inclusive,
Defendant.

ORDER ON
JOINT STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
Action Filed: December 6, 2016
Removal:
February 13, 2017
Trial:
February 6, 2018

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
M ANATT , P HELPS &
P HILLIPS , LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
COSTA MESA

JOINT STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

1

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

2

41(a)(1), Plaintiff Denise Serrano and Defendant Target Corporation (collectively,

3

“the parties”) stipulate that Plaintiff Denise Serrano voluntarily dismisses, with

4

prejudice, all of her claims against all parties including, but not limited to those

5

alleged in her Complaint against Defendant Target Corporation and all its affiliates,

6

past, present and future agents, successors, subsidiaries, parents, brother/sister

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

companies and assigns in the above-captioned action. This stipulation is made
pursuant to the terms of the parties’ settlement and release agreement in this matter
and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.
The parties agree that the Court shall have continuing jurisdiction to interpret
and enforce the provisions of the settlement and release agreement executed by the
parties.
The parties will each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees associated with
this action.
SO STIPULATED.

15
16
17

Dated: August 17, 2017

18

AEGIS LAW FIRM, PC
By: /s/ Kevin H. Sun
Samuel A. Wong
Kevin H. Sun
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DENISE SERRANO

19
20
21
22

Dated: August 17, 2017

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP

23
24
25
26

August 21, 2017

By: /s/ Mandana Massoumi
Mandana Massoumi
Matthew B. Golper
Attorneys for Defendant
TARGET CORPORATION

27
28
M ANATT , P HELPS &
P HILLIPS , LLP

2

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

JOINT STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

COSTA MESA