Spigen Korea Co., Ltd. v. Ultraproof, Inc., et al

Filing 57

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED by Judge David O. Carter. Plaintiff requests leave to file an amended complaint that addresses the issues the Court identified in its July 245, 2017 order. Id. Finding g ood cause, and seeing no objection, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file a Second Amended Complaint on or before October 10, 2017. If and when Plaintiff files an amended complaint, the Court will consider Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 47) to be moot. (see document for details). (dro)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Case No. CV 17-1161-DOC (DFM) Date: September 26, 2017 Title: SPIGEN KOREA CO., LTD V. ULTRAPROOF, INC., ET AL. PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE Deborah Goltz Courtroom Clerk Not Present Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT: None Present None Present PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED In response to an Order to Show Cause issued on September 18, 2017 (Dkt. 53), Plaintiff submitted a Response explaining that both parties misunderstood the Court’s July 24, 2017 Order granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 44). See Response, Sept. 22, 2017 (Dkt. 54). Plaintiff requests leave to file an amended complaint that addresses the issues the Court identified in its July 245, 2017 order. Id. Finding good cause, and seeing no objection, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file a Second Amended Complaint on or before October 10, 2017. If and when Plaintiff files an amended complaint, the Court will consider Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 47) to be moot. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on the parties. MINUTES FORM 11 CIVIL-GEN Initials of Deputy Clerk tg for dl

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?