Spigen Korea Co., Ltd. v. Ultraproof, Inc., et al
Filing
57
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED by Judge David O. Carter. Plaintiff requests leave to file an amended complaint that addresses the issues the Court identified in its July 24, 2017 order. Id. Finding good cause, and seeing no objection, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file a Second Amended Complaint on or before October 10, 2017. If and when Plaintiff files an amended complaint, the Court will consider Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 47) to be moot. (see document for details). (dro)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. CV 17-1161-DOC (DFM)
Date: September 26, 2017
Title: SPIGEN KOREA CO., LTD V. ULTRAPROOF, INC., ET AL.
PRESENT:
THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE
Deborah Goltz
Courtroom Clerk
Not Present
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
PLAINTIFF:
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
DEFENDANT:
None Present
None Present
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED
In response to an Order to Show Cause issued on September 18, 2017 (Dkt. 53),
Plaintiff submitted a Response explaining that both parties misunderstood the Court’s
July 24, 2017 Order granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 44). See Response,
Sept. 22, 2017 (Dkt. 54).
Plaintiff requests leave to file an amended complaint that addresses the issues the
Court identified in its July 245, 2017 order. Id. Finding good cause, and seeing no
objection, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file a Second Amended Complaint on or
before October 10, 2017. If and when Plaintiff files an amended complaint, the Court
will consider Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 47) to be moot.
The Clerk shall serve this minute order on the parties.
MINUTES FORM 11
CIVIL-GEN
Initials of Deputy Clerk
tg for dl
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?