Great Lakes Reinsurance UK SE v. ACE American Insurance Company et al

Filing 20

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF GREAT LAKES REINSURANCE (UK) SE'S MOTION OF MOTION AND MOTION TO REMAND ACTION by Judge R. Gary Klausner: Plaintiff's Motion to Remand is DENIED. (cr)

1
2

~.

3

1=

4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

1 1~ GREAT LAKES REINSURANCE
AUK)SEAformerly GREAT LAKES
12 REINSURANCE(UK)PLC)

[
PROPOSEDl ORDER G''RANTING
PLAINTIFF GREAT LAKES
REINSURANCE UK)SE'~
NOTICE OF MO ION AND
MOTION TO REMAND ACTION

Plaintiff,

13
14

CASE NO. 2:17-cv-1199 ,
.

v.

15
16

ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE
COMPANY,and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,

Date:
Time:
Dept.:

17

Aril 17, 2017
1:~0 p.m.
l0A

Defendants.
18
19
2
0

TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN:

21

The motion by Plaintiff GREAT LAKES REINSURANCE(UK)SE

22 (
formerly GREAT LAKES REINSURANCE(UK)PLC),to remand this action to the
23

Superior Court ofthe State of California for the County of Los Angeles, came to be

2 regularly heard by this Court on April 17, 2017; John S. Levitt appearing for the
4
25 Plaintiff and moving party; Darren Le Montree appearing for the Defendant Ace
2
6

American Insurance Company,and after full consideration ofthe written submissions

27 of the parties, the Court finds:
28
H:\G80-037~District Court\[proposed] order remanding 3.8.17.wpd

1

[
PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND ACTION

1

2

c.~
.
.

~
•

. •
•

•

•

.•

-• ~

•

•.

•

.

•

•

'

3
„.

4

-

-

5
6
7
8
9

APR 2 0 2G~7
Dated:
onora e
United States istrict Court

10

u ge o t e

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2
0
21
22
23
24
25
2
6
27
28 I
H:\G80-037~Dish-ict Court\[proposed] order remanding 3.8.17.wpd

2

[
PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND ACTION