CW5 David Clark v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC et al
Filing
18
ORDER APPROVING Stipulation to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) (A)(ii) 17 by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell that the Stipulation is APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER OR DERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the separate settlement agreement entered into between the Parties. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all future hearing dates in this action are hereby vacated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
JS-6
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION
3
CW5 DAVID CLARK,
Plaintiff,
4
5
6
7
Case No.: 2:17-cv-01509-BRO-MRW
Hon. District Judge Beverly Reid
O’Connell
v.
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC;
and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive,
Defendants.
8
ORDER APPROVING
STIPULATION TO DISMISS
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO
FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
[No Hearing Required]
9
Action Filed: January 17, 2017
Trial Date:
NA
10
11
12
The Court having considered the Stipulation to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to
13
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (the “Stipulation”) entered into by and
14
between plaintiff CW5 David Clark and defendant Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC,
15
and good cause appearing therefor,
16
IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation is APPROVED.
17
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed with
18
prejudice.
19
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the
20
purpose of enforcing the terms of the separate settlement agreement entered into
21
between the Parties.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all future hearing dates in this action are
22
23
hereby vacated.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 15, 2017
25
26
By:
Honorable Beverly R. O’Connell
United States District Court Judge
27
28
CASE NO.: 2:17-CV-01509-BRO-MRW
1
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
954836.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?