CW5 David Clark v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC et al

Filing 18

ORDER APPROVING Stipulation to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) (A)(ii) 17 by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell that the Stipulation is APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER OR DERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the separate settlement agreement entered into between the Parties. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all future hearing dates in this action are hereby vacated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 3 CW5 DAVID CLARK, Plaintiff, 4 5 6 7 Case No.: 2:17-cv-01509-BRO-MRW Hon. District Judge Beverly Reid O’Connell v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendants. 8 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) [No Hearing Required] 9 Action Filed: January 17, 2017 Trial Date: NA 10 11 12 The Court having considered the Stipulation to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to 13 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (the “Stipulation”) entered into by and 14 between plaintiff CW5 David Clark and defendant Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, 15 and good cause appearing therefor, 16 IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation is APPROVED. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed with 18 prejudice. 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the 20 purpose of enforcing the terms of the separate settlement agreement entered into 21 between the Parties. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all future hearing dates in this action are 22 23 hereby vacated. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 15, 2017 25 26 By: Honorable Beverly R. O’Connell United States District Court Judge 27 28 CASE NO.: 2:17-CV-01509-BRO-MRW 1 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT 954836.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?