Peter George Noe v. Warden

Filing 27

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition without prejudice. (afe)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 PETER GEORGE NOE, 12 13 Petitioner, v. 14 Warden, USP VICTORVILLE, 15 Respondents. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. CV 17-01574-AB (AS) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the 20 Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and 21 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. After having made a 22 de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation 23 to which objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts 24 the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge in the Report and 25 Recommendation. 26 27 IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the 28 Petition without prejudice. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, 2 the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein 3 on counsel for Petitioner and counsel for Respondents. 4 5 LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. 6 7 DATED: September 11, 2017. 8 9 10 11 12 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 ______________________________ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?