Peter George Noe v. Warden
Filing
27
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition without prejudice. (afe)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
10
11 PETER GEORGE NOE,
12
13
Petitioner,
v.
14 Warden, USP VICTORVILLE,
15
Respondents.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. CV 17-01574-AB (AS)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the
20 Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and
21 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. After having made a
22 de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation
23 to which objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts
24 the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge in the Report and
25 Recommendation.
26
27
IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the
28 Petition without prejudice.
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order,
2 the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein
3 on counsel for Petitioner and counsel for Respondents.
4
5
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
6
7
DATED: September 11, 2017.
8
9
10
11
12
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16 ______________________________
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?