Centurion Medical Liability Risk Retention Group, Inc et al v. Gonzalez et al
Filing
85
ORDER TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND REQUEST TO RETAIN JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner, 84 . Refer to the Court's order for details. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (pso)
1
2
JS-6
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
CENTURION MEDICAL LIABILITY
PROTECTIVE RISK RETENTION
GROUP, INC., an Arizona Corporation
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Plaintiff,
vs.
CELINA GONZALEZ, CNM, an
individual; STEPHEN N. PINE, MD, an
individual; S. PINE, A MEDICAL
CORPORATION, a California
professional corporation; JOSHUA
HERNANDEZ, a minor by JUAN
HERNANDEZ, his guardian ad litem,
Case No.: 2:17-cv-01581 BRO RGK
[Assigned to Hon. R. Gary Klausner
Roybal Courtroom 850]
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS
ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE AND REQUEST TO
RETAIN JURISDICTION TO
ENFORCE SETTLEMENT
Complaint Filed: 2/27/2017
Trial Date: Not Set.
Defendants.
--------------------------------------------------AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM
24
25
Having considered the Stipulation of counsel and GOOD CAUSE
26
APPEARING THEREFORE, it is HEREBY ORDERED that this matter be dismissed
27
with prejudice in its entirety, with the Court to reserve jurisdiction to enforce the
28
Settlement Agreement pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 664.6 and
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
2787001 p36 order dismiss docx
1
Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Inc. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994) and Alvarado v. Table
2
Mountain Rancheria, 509 F.3d 1008, 1017 (9th Cir. 2007). Each of the Parties are to
3
bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.
4
5
6
DATED:
November 07, 2017
_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
2787001 p36 order dismiss docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?