Centurion Medical Liability Risk Retention Group, Inc et al v. Gonzalez et al

Filing 85

ORDER TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND REQUEST TO RETAIN JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner, 84 . Refer to the Court's order for details. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (pso)

Download PDF
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 CENTURION MEDICAL LIABILITY PROTECTIVE RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC., an Arizona Corporation 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff, vs. CELINA GONZALEZ, CNM, an individual; STEPHEN N. PINE, MD, an individual; S. PINE, A MEDICAL CORPORATION, a California professional corporation; JOSHUA HERNANDEZ, a minor by JUAN HERNANDEZ, his guardian ad litem, Case No.: 2:17-cv-01581 BRO RGK [Assigned to Hon. R. Gary Klausner Roybal Courtroom 850] [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND REQUEST TO RETAIN JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT Complaint Filed: 2/27/2017 Trial Date: Not Set. Defendants. --------------------------------------------------AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM 24 25 Having considered the Stipulation of counsel and GOOD CAUSE 26 APPEARING THEREFORE, it is HEREBY ORDERED that this matter be dismissed 27 with prejudice in its entirety, with the Court to reserve jurisdiction to enforce the 28 Settlement Agreement pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 664.6 and 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 2787001 p36 order dismiss docx 1 Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Inc. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994) and Alvarado v. Table 2 Mountain Rancheria, 509 F.3d 1008, 1017 (9th Cir. 2007). Each of the Parties are to 3 bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. 4 5 6 DATED: November 07, 2017 _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 2787001 p36 order dismiss docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?