Los Angeles Unified School District v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles et al

Filing 36

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, on its own motion, orders third party plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before August 8, 2017 why the third party complaint sho uld not be dismissed as to third party defendants Sophie Weisenberg and Doris Sebulsky for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written r esponse on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to third party defendants Sophie Weisenberg and Doris Sebulsky if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. (iv)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Date CV 17-1583-DMG (JEMx) July 25, 2017 Title Los Angeles Unified School District v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, et al. Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kane Tien Deputy Clerk Not Reported Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Not Present Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) Not Present Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Generally, defendant must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). In the present case, it appears that these time periods have not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders third party plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before August 8, 2017 why the third party complaint should not be dismissed as to third party defendants Sophie Weisenberg and Doris Sebulsky for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to third party defendants Sophie Weisenberg and Doris Sebulsky if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. CV-90 CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk KT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?