Carlos Barrios v. Zico Beverages, LLC

Filing 40

ORDER GRANTING AMENDED Stipulation 39 of Dismissal Pursuant to FRCP 41(A)(1)(A)(II) by Judge Fernando M. Olguin that this action is DISMISSED, in its entirety. Plaintiff Carlos Barrios's individual claims are dismissed with prejudice. The putative class claims are dismissed without prejudice. Each party is to bear his or its own fees and costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 JS-6 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION CARLOS BARRIOS, individually, and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 v. CASE NO. 2:17-cv-01712-FMO (KSx) ORDER GRANTING AMENDED STIPULATION [39] OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(A)(1)(A)(II) ZICO BEVERAGES LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 17 Defendant. Complaint Filed: March 2, 2017 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE EAST\147896508.1 1 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this 2 action is DISMISSED, in its entirety. Plaintiff Carlos Barrios’s individual claims 3 are dismissed with prejudice. The putative class claims are dismissed without 4 prejudice. Each party is to bear his or its own fees and costs. 5 Having considered the parties’ submissions and good cause appearing 6 therefor, the Court determines that (1) this dismissal is not the product of 7 collusion; and (2) the proposed dismissal will not prejudice absent putative class 8 members “with a reasonable reliance expectation of the maintenance of the action 9 for the protection of their interests.” Therefore, notice to the putative class 10 members is not required. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Dated: October 27, 2017 14 By: _________/s/_________________ Hon. Fernando Olguin 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE EAST\147896508.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?