Cynthia Morris v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al

Filing 33

JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: After consideration of the papers in support of and in opposition to defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, this Court orders summary judgment in favor of Defendants as follows: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff take nothing against Defendants, that the action be dismissed on the merits against Defendants, and that Defendants recover their costs. ***NOTE CHANGES MADE BY COURT*** (ab) Modified on 5/29/2018 (ab).

E-FILED-5/29/18

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

HILL, FARRER & BURRILL LLP
James A. Bowles (Bar No. 089383)
E-mail: [e-mail]
Casey L. Morris (Bar No. 238455)
E-mail: [e-mail]
Erika A. Silverman (Bar No. 301864)
E-mail: [e-mail]
One California Plaza, 37th Floor
300 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3147
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT.
Attorneys for Defendants
Charter Communications Inc., and Time
Warner Cable, Inc.

A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ONE CALIFORNIA PLAZA, 37TH FLOOR
300 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071–3147

HILL, FARRER & BURRILL LLP

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13

CYNTHIA MORRIS, an individual,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17
18
19

[Proposed] Judgment

vs.
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS,
INC., a Delaware corporation; TIME
WARNER CABLE, INC., a
Delaware corporation; and DOES
1through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CASE NO. 2:17-cv-1725-PSG (AGRx)

Date:
Time:
Ct. Rm.:
Trial:

May 21, 2018
1: 30 p.m.
6A
June 26, 2018

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
The motion of Defendants Charter Communications Inc. and Time
Warner Cable Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) for summary judgment came on
regularly for hearing before this court on May 21, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. Casey L.
Morris of Hill, Farrer & Burrill, LLP, appeared as attorneys for Defendants, and
Rob Nichols of The Law Offices of Rob Nichols appeared as attorney for Plaintiff
Cynthia Morris.
After consideration of the papers in support of and in opposition to
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

1

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and the oral argument of counsel, this

2

Court orders summary judgment in favor of Defendants as follows:

3

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff take nothing against

4

Defendants, that the action be dismissed on the merits against Defendants, and that

5

Defendants recover their costs.

6
7
8

5/29/18
DATED: ___________________

PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ

________________________________
Philip S. Gutierrez
United States District Judge

HFB 1896522.1 A5431084

9

A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ONE CALIFORNIA PLAZA, 37TH FLOOR
300 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071–3147

HILL, FARRER & BURRILL LLP

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–2–
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT