Sina Kianpour v. Wells Fargo, et al

Filing 90

JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: 1. This entire action and each of Plaintiffs claims are dismissed with prejudice. 2. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and against Plaintiff Sina Kianpour3. Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is the prevailing party in this actionand is entitled to costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5

January 16, 2018

6

VC
P

7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION

12 SINA KIANPOUR,
Plaintiff,

13
14

Case No. 2:17-cv-01757 SJO (GJSx)

vs.

15 WELLS FARGO, WELLS FARGO
BANK, N.A.,
16
Defendants.
17

JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT OR PARTIAL
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

18
19
20
21

The Court having entered, On January 16, 2018, its Order Granting Motion

22 for Summary Judgment in its entirety and as to all of Plaintiff’s claims,
23

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

24

1.

This entire action and each of Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed with

25 prejudice.
26

2.

Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and

27 against Plaintiff Sina Kianpour.
28 / / /
1

2:17-cv-01757 SJO (GJSx)
JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

3.

Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is the prevailing party in this action

2 and is entitled to costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d).
3
4 DATED: January 16, 2018

By: ____________________________
Honorable S. James Otero
Judge of the U.S. District Court

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

2:17-cv-01757 SJO (GJSx)
JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT