Classic Concepts, Inc. v. Muuduu Furniture et al
Filing
30
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO FOLLOW LOCAL RULES by Judge David O. Carter. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file the required documentation on or before June 23, 2017. Failure to do so may result in this case being dismissed for lack of prosecution. (see document for details). (dro)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. SA CV 17-1873-DOC (SKx)
XX
Date: June 19, 2017
Title: CLASSIC CONCEPTS, INC. V. MUUDUU FURNITURE ET AL.
PRESENT:
THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE
Deborah Goltz
Courtroom Clerk
Not Present
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
PLAINTIFF:
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
DEFENDANT:
None Present
None Present
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO
FOLLOW LOCAL RULES
On March 9, 2017, the Court issued a Notice to Counsel re: Copyright, Patent, and
Trademark Reporting Requirements (“Notice”) (Dkt. 10). The Notice advised Plaintiff
that it had failed to conform to Local Rule 3-1, and had ten days to do so. To date,
Plaintiff has failed to provide the Clerk of the Court with an original and two copies of
either (1) the required notice (AO 120) to the Patent and Trademark Office in patent,
plant variety protection and trademark matters, or (2) the required notice (AO 121) in
copyright matters.
Plaintiff is ORDERED to file the required documentation on or before June 23,
2017. Failure to do so may result in this case being dismissed for lack of prosecution.
The Clerk shall serve this minute order on the parties.
MINUTES FORM 11
CIVIL-GEN
Initials of Deputy Clerk: djg
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?