Marshall Sale v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc. et al
Filing
91
ORDER GRANTING Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Entire Action With Prejudice 90 by Judge S. James Otero that Plaintiff First Amended Complaint in theabove-referenced action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Pursuant to the Parties Stipulation, each party shall bear their own respective attorneys fees and costs. The trial set for 4/10/18 is vacated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
March 13, 2018
5
VC
P
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
MARSHALL SALE, an individual,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., a
16 Delaware corporation; MERRILL
LYNCH PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH,
17 INC., a Delaware corporation and
DOES 1 through 10,
18
Defendant.
19
CASE NO. 2:17-cv-01904 SJO
(MRWx)
ORDER GRANTIG JOINT
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
99161390.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTIG JOINT
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
1
2
ORDER
Having reviewed and considered the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Entire
3 Action With Prejudice submitted by Plaintiff Marshall Sale (“Plaintiff”) and
4 Defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated (“Defendant”)
5 (collectively, the “Parties”):
6
7
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint in the
8 above-referenced action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
9 Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation, each party shall bear
10 their own respective attorney’s fees and costs.
11
12
The trial set for 4/10/18 is vacated.
13
14 IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
DATED:_3/13/18
17
HONORABLE S. JAMES OTERO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
99161390.1
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTIG JOINT
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?