Linda Mendoza et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 23

JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt, Related to: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint 10 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ah)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 RAMON MENDOZA and LINDA
MENDOZA,
12
13
14

CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-1958-JAK(MRWx)
JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs,
JS-6
v.

15
16

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; and
DOES 1-10, inclusive,

17
Defendants

18
19
20
21

Because this matter has been dismissed with prejudice, IT IS HEREBY

22 ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
23

1.

Judgment is entered in favor of defendant WELLS FARGO BANK,

24 N.A., successor by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a
25 Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB (“Wells Fargo”) and
26 against plaintiffs Ramon Mendoza and Linda Mendoza on the Complaint and all
27 causes of action alleged therein;
28
1

1

2.

2

Wells Fargo; and

3

3.

4

recovery of costs and attorney’s fees to the extent there is a legal and factual

5

basis for each such request.

Plaintiffs shall take and recover nothing in this action from defendant

As the prevailing party, Wells Fargo shall be entitled to seek the

6
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8

9
10 DATED: June 30, 2017
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JOHN A. KRONSTADT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE