Wiley Gill Jr. v. California Attorney General

Filing 8

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge David O. Carter. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted 5 ; 2. Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice; and 3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties. See document for further information. (dv)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

WILEY GILL, JR.,
Petitioner,

13

v.

14
15
16

CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY
GENERAL,
Respondent.

17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. LA CV 17-2105 DOC (JCG)
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

18

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate

19

Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record. No objections to the

20

Report and Recommendation have been filed.

21
22

//

23
24

//

25
26

//

27
28

//
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

2

1.

The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

3

2.

Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice; and

4

3.

The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

5

Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the

6

Court finds that Petitioner has not shown that “jurists of reason would find it debatable

7

whether”: (1) “the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right”;

8

and (2) “the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” See Slack v. McDaniel,

9

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of

10

appealability.

11
12
13
14

DATED: May 26, 2017

_______________
HON. DAVID O. CARTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2