Raffi Torossian v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
29
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge R. Gary Klausner, 28 , 27 (pso)
1 SUZANNE M. HANKINS (State Bar No. 157837)
smh@severson.com
2 JARLATH M. CURRAN, II (State Bar No. 239352)
jmc@severson.com
3 ANDREW L. MINEGAR (State Bar No. 280330)
alm@severson.com
4 SEVERSON & WERSON, A Professional Corporation
The Atrium
5 19100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700
Irvine, California 92612
6 Telephone: (949) 442-7110
Facsimile: (949) 442-7118
7
MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622)
8 mdl@severson.com
SEVERSON & WERSON, A Professional Corporation
9 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94111
10 Telephone: (415) 398-3344
Facsimile: (415) 956-0439
11
Attorneys for Defendant
12 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. dba
AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — WESTERN DIVISION
16 RAFFI TOROSSIAN, an individual,
Plaintiff,
17
18
vs.
19 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. dba
AMERICA’S SERVICING
20 COMPANY; SPECIALIZED LOAN
SERVICING LLC; and DOES 1
21 through 50, inclusive,
22
Defendants.
Case No. 2:17-cv-02163 RGK (PJWx)
Hon. R. Gary Klausner
Ctrm. 850 – Temple St.
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF
DISMISSAL
Action Filed: January 13, 2017
Removal Date: March 20, 2017
Trial Date:
None Set
23
24
25
26
27
28
55000.2074/10818159.1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
1
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE,
2
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Wells
3 Fargo Bank, N.A. dba America’s Servicing Company (“Wells Fargo”) shall have a
4 judgment of dismissal entered in its favor and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff’s entire
5 action is dismissed with prejudice as to Wells Fargo. Plaintiff shall take nothing
6 against Wells Fargo.
7
8 DATED: July 07, 2017
9
10
___________________________________
R. GARY KLAUSNER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
55000.2074/10818159.1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
PROOF OF SERVICE
Torossian v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.
USDC Case No. 2:17-cv-02163 RGK (PJWx)
1
2
At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this
action. I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. My business
4 address is The Atrium, 19100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700, Irvine, CA 92612.
3
5
On July 6, 2017, I served true copies of the following document(s):
6
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
7 on the interested parties in this action as follows:
SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST
8
BY CM/ECF NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING: I electronically filed
the document(s) with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system.
10 Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the
CM/ECF system. Participants in the case who are not registered CM/ECF users will
11 be served by mail or by other means permitted by the court rules.
9
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
America that the foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the
13 office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made.
12
14
Executed on July 6, 2017, at Irvine, California.
15
16
17
18
Stephanie A. Crisp
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
55000.2074/10818159.1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
SERVICE LIST
Torossian v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.
USDC Case No. 2:17-cv-02163 RGK (PJWx)
1
2
3 Patricia Rodriguez, Esq.
RODRIGUEZ LAW GROUP, INC.
1492 W. Colorado Blvd., Suite 120
4
Pasadena, CA 91105
5
6
Timothy M. Ryan, Esq.
7 Michael W. Stoltzman, Jr., Esq.
THE RYAN FIRM
8 A Professional Corporation
30 Corporate Park, Suite 310
9 Irvine, CA 92606
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RAFFI TOROSSIAN
Telephone: (626) 888-5206
Facsimile: (626) 282-0522
prod@attorneyprod.com
Attorneys for Defendant
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC
Telephone: (949) 263-1800
Facsimile: (949) 872-2211
tryan@theryanfirm.com
mstoltzman@theryanfirm.com
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
55000.2074/10818159.1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?