Raffi Torossian v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 29

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge R. Gary Klausner, 28 , 27 (pso)

Download PDF
1 SUZANNE M. HANKINS (State Bar No. 157837) smh@severson.com 2 JARLATH M. CURRAN, II (State Bar No. 239352) jmc@severson.com 3 ANDREW L. MINEGAR (State Bar No. 280330) alm@severson.com 4 SEVERSON & WERSON, A Professional Corporation The Atrium 5 19100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700 Irvine, California 92612 6 Telephone: (949) 442-7110 Facsimile: (949) 442-7118 7 MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622) 8 mdl@severson.com SEVERSON & WERSON, A Professional Corporation 9 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 10 Telephone: (415) 398-3344 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 11 Attorneys for Defendant 12 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. dba AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — WESTERN DIVISION 16 RAFFI TOROSSIAN, an individual, Plaintiff, 17 18 vs. 19 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. dba AMERICA’S SERVICING 20 COMPANY; SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC; and DOES 1 21 through 50, inclusive, 22 Defendants. Case No. 2:17-cv-02163 RGK (PJWx) Hon. R. Gary Klausner Ctrm. 850 – Temple St. [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL Action Filed: January 13, 2017 Removal Date: March 20, 2017 Trial Date: None Set 23 24 25 26 27 28 55000.2074/10818159.1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 1 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, 2 IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Wells 3 Fargo Bank, N.A. dba America’s Servicing Company (“Wells Fargo”) shall have a 4 judgment of dismissal entered in its favor and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff’s entire 5 action is dismissed with prejudice as to Wells Fargo. Plaintiff shall take nothing 6 against Wells Fargo. 7 8 DATED: July 07, 2017 9 10 ___________________________________ R. GARY KLAUSNER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 55000.2074/10818159.1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL PROOF OF SERVICE Torossian v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al. USDC Case No. 2:17-cv-02163 RGK (PJWx) 1 2 At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. My business 4 address is The Atrium, 19100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700, Irvine, CA 92612. 3 5 On July 6, 2017, I served true copies of the following document(s): 6 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 7 on the interested parties in this action as follows: SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST 8 BY CM/ECF NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING: I electronically filed the document(s) with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system. 10 Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF system. Participants in the case who are not registered CM/ECF users will 11 be served by mail or by other means permitted by the court rules. 9 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the 13 office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. 12 14 Executed on July 6, 2017, at Irvine, California. 15 16 17 18 Stephanie A. Crisp 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 55000.2074/10818159.1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL SERVICE LIST Torossian v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al. USDC Case No. 2:17-cv-02163 RGK (PJWx) 1 2 3 Patricia Rodriguez, Esq. RODRIGUEZ LAW GROUP, INC. 1492 W. Colorado Blvd., Suite 120 4 Pasadena, CA 91105 5 6 Timothy M. Ryan, Esq. 7 Michael W. Stoltzman, Jr., Esq. THE RYAN FIRM 8 A Professional Corporation 30 Corporate Park, Suite 310 9 Irvine, CA 92606 Attorneys for Plaintiff RAFFI TOROSSIAN Telephone: (626) 888-5206 Facsimile: (626) 282-0522 prod@attorneyprod.com Attorneys for Defendant SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC Telephone: (949) 263-1800 Facsimile: (949) 872-2211 tryan@theryanfirm.com mstoltzman@theryanfirm.com 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 55000.2074/10818159.1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?