Andres Gomez v. Jacks N Joe, LLC, et al
Filing
15
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than August 18, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In accor dance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (iv)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
CASE NO.: CV-17-2398-R
DATE: AUGUST 4, 2017
TITLE:
ANDRES GOMEZ -V.- JACKS N JOE, LLC, et al.
==================================================================
PRESENT:
HON. MANUEL L. REAL, JUDGE
Christine Chung
Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:
Not present
N/A
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
Not present
PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF
PROSECUTION
Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than August 18, 2017 why
this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to
this OSC, on or before the above date:
- Plaintiff's filing of a noticed motion for entry of default judgment
In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local
Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered
by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the
Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the
dismissal of the action.
MINUTES FORM II
CIVIL - GEN
Initials of Deputy Clerk _ CCH__
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?