David Spacone v. Sanford, LP et al

Filing 76

JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 75 , the Court HEREBY ENTERS JUDGMENT as follows: The Court hereby dismisses with prejudice and enters judgment on the individual claims alleged by Plaintiff in his First Amended Complaint, pursu ant to the Parties' Stipulation, and expressly subject to a preservation of Plaintiff's right to appeal the Court's Order on Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification 67 . As all claims have been finally adjudicated or settled, this case is fully and finally adjudicated and FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby ENTERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

DAVID SPACONE, individually,
and on behalf of a class of similarly
situated individuals,

13

Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17

vs.

  Case No.: 2:17-cv-02419-AB-MRW
Hon. André Birotte Jr.
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

ELMER’S PRODUCTS, INC., a
Delaware corporation, and DOES 1
through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO 2:17-CV-02419-AB-MRW
JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT

1
2

Pursuant to Plaintiff David Spacone (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Sanford,

3

L.P.’s (erroneously sued as Elmer’s Products, Inc.) Stipulation for Entry of

4

Judgment, the Court HEREBY ENTERS JUDGMENT as follows:

5

The Court hereby dismisses with prejudice and enters judgment on the

6

individual claims alleged by Plaintiff in his First Amended Complaint, pursuant

7

to the Parties’ Stipulation, and expressly subject to a preservation of Plaintiff’s

8

right to appeal the Court’s Order on Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification

9

(Dkt. No. 67).

10
11

As all claims have been finally adjudicated or settled, this case is fully and
finally adjudicated and FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby ENTERED.

12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED

14
15
16
17

Dated: __September 27, 2018__________
Hon. André Birotte Jr.
Judge of the United States District Court
Central District of California

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

CASE NO 2:17-CV-02419-AB-MRW