Carlos Rivas v. United States of America et al.

Filing 15

ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: On 6/30/2017, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to Defendant Enterprise Holdings, Inc. [13 ]. No response having been filed to the Court's Order to Show Cause, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the case is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Carlos Rivas 11 12 13 Case No. CV 17-02432-AB (SKx) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. United States of America et al. 14 Defendants. 15 (PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On June 30, 2017, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to Defendant Enterprise Holdings, Inc. A written response to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than July 14, 2017. No response having been filed to the Court’s Order to Show Cause, /// /// /// 1. 1 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled case is dismissed, 2 without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of 3 the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41. 4 5 6 7 8 Dated: July 19, 2017 _______________________________________ ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?