Charles Keller Cooper Jr. v. Volodinos et al

Filing 80

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 78 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the Unit ed States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to exhaust remedies 44 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Rosenberg for further proceedings. (kl)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CHARLES KELLER COOPER, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) DEPUTY VALDOVINOS, ) ) Defendant. ) ) NO. CV 17-2463-FMO (AGR) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to exhaust remedies is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Rosenberg for further proceedings. DATED: December 11, 2018 /s/ FERNANDO M. OLGUIN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?