United States of America v. One Super Panga Boat Equipped With Four Yamaha 350 HP Outboard Motors

Filing 25

CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II in favor of United States of America against One Super Panga Boat Equipped With Four Yamaha 350 HP Outboard Motors. No other person or entity shall have any right, title or interest therein. The United States is ordered to dispose of the defendant panga in accordance with law. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 JS-6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 WESTERN DIVISION 15 16 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 17 Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 ONE SUPER PANGA BOAT EQUIPPED WITH FOUR YAMAHA 350 HP OUTBOARD MOTORS, Case No. CV 17-02500-ODW(AFM) 20 21 CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE Defendant. 22 23 24 TRAVIS LOBO, Claimant. 25 26 This civil forfeiture action was commenced on March 31, 2017, against the 27 defendant One Super Panga Boat Equipped With Four Yamaha 350 HP Outboard 28 Motors (the “defendant panga”), seized on or about April 10, 2012, by the Santa Barbara 1 County Sheriff’s Office on Tajiguas Beach in Santa Barbara, California. On May 16, 2 2017, Travis Lobo (“Lobo”) filed a claim of interest and an answer to the complaint. On 3 November 3, 2017, Lobo filed a withdrawal of his claim. 4 appeared in this case and the time for filing claims of interest and answers has expired. No other parties have 5 Plaintiff United States of America and Lobo have reached an agreement that is 6 dispositive of the action. The parties have requested that the Court enter this Consent 7 Judgment of Forfeiture. 8 WHEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 9 1. 10 11 This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action. 2. Notice of this action has been given in accordance with law. All potential 12 claimants to the defendant panga, other than Lobo, are deemed to have admitted the 13 allegations of the Complaint. The allegations set out in the Complaint are sufficient to 14 establish a basis for forfeiture. 15 3. The United States of America shall have judgment as to the defendant 16 panga, and no other person or entity shall have any right, title or interest therein. The 17 United States is ordered to dispose of the defendant panga in accordance with law. 18 4. Lobo has agreed to release the United States of America, its agencies, 19 agents, and officers, including employees, officers and agents of the Department of 20 Homeland Security – U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Santa Barbara Sheriff’s 21 Department, from any and all claims, actions or liabilities arising out of or related to this 22 action or the underlying seizures, including, without limitation, any claim for attorney’s 23 fees, costs or interest in this federal forfeiture action, whether pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 24 2465 or otherwise. 25 defendant panga, said petition is withdrawn and Lobo has waived any rights he may have 26 to seek remission or mitigation of the forfeiture of the defendant panga to be forfeited by 27 this judgment. 28 5. If Lobo has submitted a petition for remission concerning the This agreement is not admissible in any proceeding, civil or criminal, 2 1 except for purposes of enforcing or interpreting the terms of the agreement. Each of the 2 Parties shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs in connection with this matter. 3 6. The Parties waive all appeal rights with respect to this forfeiture matter. 4 7. The Court finds that there was reasonable cause for the seizure of the 5 defendant currency and institution of these proceedings. This judgment shall be 6 construed as a certificate of reasonable cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 November 8, 2017 11 12 13 14 OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?