Gustavo Alonso v. United States of America

Filing 7

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING Motion under 28 USC section 2255, to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a person in Federal Custody 1 by Judge John F. Walter: After reviewing the record and the briefs and evidence submitted by the parties and for the reasons stated in the Government Opposition, the Court denies the Motion. Because the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL Case No. CV 17-2599-JFW Date: April 26, 2017 CR12-1208 JFW Title: Gustavo Alonso -v- United States of America PRESENT: HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Shannon Reilly Courtroom Deputy None Present Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: None PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: None ORDER DENYING MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2255, TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE BY A PERSON IN FEDERAL CUSTODY [filed 4/5/17, Dkt. No. 1] On April 5, 2017, the Petitioner Gustavo Alonso (“Petitioner”) filed a Motion under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255, to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody. On April 24, 2017, Respondent United States of America (“Government”) filed its Opposition. The Court finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. After considering the moving and opposing papers and arguments therein, the Court rules as follows: After reviewing the record and the briefs and evidence submitted by the parties and for the reasons stated in the Government’s Opposition, the Court denies the Motion. Because the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. See, 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2). IT IS SO ORDERED. Initials of Deputy Clerk sr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?