Gustavo Alonso v. United States of America
Filing
7
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING Motion under 28 USC section 2255, to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a person in Federal Custody 1 by Judge John F. Walter: After reviewing the record and the briefs and evidence submitted by the parties and for the reasons stated in the Government Opposition, the Court denies the Motion. Because the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
JS-6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL
Case No.
CV 17-2599-JFW
Date: April 26, 2017
CR12-1208 JFW
Title:
Gustavo Alonso -v- United States of America
PRESENT:
HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Shannon Reilly
Courtroom Deputy
None Present
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:
None
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS):
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
None
ORDER DENYING MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C.
SECTION 2255, TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR
CORRECT SENTENCE BY A PERSON IN FEDERAL
CUSTODY [filed 4/5/17, Dkt. No. 1]
On April 5, 2017, the Petitioner Gustavo Alonso (“Petitioner”) filed a Motion under 28 U.S.C.
Section 2255, to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody. On April
24, 2017, Respondent United States of America (“Government”) filed its Opposition. The Court
finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. After considering the moving and
opposing papers and arguments therein, the Court rules as follows:
After reviewing the record and the briefs and evidence submitted by the parties and for the
reasons stated in the Government’s Opposition, the Court denies the Motion.
Because the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right, a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. See, 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Initials of Deputy Clerk sr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?