Omar Morgades v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin that the above-captioned case is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (jp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OMAR MORGADES, individually and on )
behalf of all others similarly situated,
PIONEER CREDIT RECOVERY INC., et )
NO. CV 17-2605 FMO (FFMx)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT
On April 25, 2017, the court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be
dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28
U.S.C. § 1332(d). (See Dkt. 9, Court’s Order of April 25, 2017).
In plaintiff’s Reply of Non-Opposition on Order to Show Cause re: Subject Matter
Jurisdiction (Dkt. 10), plaintiff states that it “has not been able to confirm” whether “the range of
damages . . . meets the jurisdictional requirement,” (id. at 2), and “does not oppose the Court’s
finding that there is a valid question of subject matter jurisdiction relating to the amount in
controversy requirement” under CAFA. (Id. at 1). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the above-
captioned case is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Dated this 8th day of May, 2017.
Fernando M. Olguin
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?