PassKey Publications Licensing Corp. v. COED Group, LLC et al

Filing 37

FINAL JUDGMENT ONCONSENT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: Consent judgment is hereby entered against Defendants for monetary relief in the amount set forth in the Parties' Confidential Settlement A greement. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, and licensees, successors and assigns, and all persons or entities in active concert or participation with any of them who rec eive notice of this Final Judgment on Consent, are hereby PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from reproducing, adapting, publishing, marketing, promoting, advertising, distributing, selling, and/or otherwise disposing of any materials, in any media, incorporating content identical or substantially similar to content comprising PassKey's EA Materials. (iv)

Download PDF
  JS-6 1   2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA     4 5 PASSKEY PUBLICATIONS LICENSING CORP., a California Corporation, 6 Plaintiff, 7 10   FINAL JUDGMENT ON CONSENT vs. 8 9 Case No. 2:17-cv-2731-MWF-E COED GROUP, LLC, a New Jersey Corporation, KAPLI, INC., a New York Corporation; PLUS CAREER INC., a New York Corporation, and DOES 1- 10, 11 Defendants. 12   WHEREAS, on April 10, 2017, Plaintiff PassKey Publications Licensing 13   14 Corporation initiated the instant action against Coed Group, LLC, Kapli, Inc., and 15 Plus Career, Inc. (“Defendants”) for violations of the federal copyright laws, 17 16 U.S.C. § 101, et seq.;       WHEREAS, Entry of Default was entered against Defendants on August 14, 17   18 2017, and Default Judgment was entered against Defendants on November 7, 19 2017;     20 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants have requested the Court to set aside   21 the Entry of Default and Default Judgment;   22 WHEREAS, Defendants consent to the entry of Final Judgment on Consent; 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 24 Plaintiff owns valid copyrights in the EA Materials as set forth in the       25 Amended Complaint.   26 Defendants’ conduct as set forth in the Amended Complaint constitutes   27 infringement of Plaintiff’s copyrights in its EA Materials.   28 FINAL JUDGMENT ON CONSENT Case No. 2:17-cv-273-MWF-E 1 1 Consent judgment is hereby entered as follows: 2 a.   Consent judgment is hereby entered against Defendants for monetary   3 relief in the amount set forth in the Parties’ Confidential Settlement Agreement.   4 b. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 5 c. Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 502(a), Defendants, their agents, servants,     6 employees, and licensees, successors and assigns, and all persons or entities in 7 active concert or participation with any of them who receive notice of this Final 8 Judgment on Consent, are hereby PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from 9 reproducing, adapting, publishing, marketing, promoting, advertising, distributing,         10 selling, and/or otherwise disposing of any materials, in any media, incorporating 11 content identical or substantially similar to content comprising PassKey’s EA 12 Materials.       13 Defendants must disclose this Final Judgment on Consent to all of their   14 successors and assigns.   15 The Court shall maintain jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of 16 this civil action for the purpose of interpreting and enforcing this Final Judgment 17 on Consent, and the Confidential Settlement Agreement entered into separately by 18 the parties.         19 The parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby consent to the entry   20 of this Final Judgment on Consent.   21 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND CONSENTED. 22 Respectfully submitted,     OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, P.C. 23   24   25 26 27 Dated: February 22, 2018 By Linda Joy Kattwinkel Lawrence G. Townsend   28 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT ON CONSENT Case No. 2:17-cv-273-MWF-E 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?