L.A. Gem and Jewelry Design, Inc. v. NJS.COM LLC, et al
Filing
25
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. re Stipulation for Protective Order 24 . (See Order for Further Details) (kl)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Milord A. Keshishian, SBN 197835
milord@milordlaw.com
J. Nicolas Anwandter, SBN 294677
nico@milordlaw.com
MILORD & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
10517 West Pico Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90064
Tel: (310) 226-7878
Fax: (310) 226-7879
Attorneys for Plaintiff
L.A. GEM & JEWELRY DESIGN, INC.
9
10
11
MILORD & ASSOCIATES, PC
10517 West Pico Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 226-7878
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
L.A. GEM & JEWELRY DESIGN,
INC., a California corporation,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NJS.COM, LLC, d/b/a
NAMEJEWELRYSPOT, a Delaware )
limited liability company; and DOES 1- )
)
10
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 2:17-cv-02747 AB (JEMx)
District: Hon. Andre Birotte Jr.
Magistrate: Hon. John E. McDermott
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER
[DISCOVERY DOCUMENT:
REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE JOHN E. MCDERMOTT]
1
GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT
2
Subject to the approval of the Court, all documents, material or information
3
produced or created by a party or non-party (“Source”) to a party in this action
4
(“Receiving Party”) containing information which the Source or a party believes in
5
good faith to be confidential or trade secret information, shall be designated as
6
CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY by the
7
Source or a party and maintained by the Receiving Party(ies) pursuant to the terms
8
of this Order.
9
I.
GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT
10
A.
11
Plaintiff is in the business of manufacturing, marketing, and selling jewelry.
Factual Background
MILORD & ASSOCIATES, PC
10517 West Pico Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 226-7878
12
Defendant is an online reseller for jewelry and other accessories. Because of the
13
parties’ status as competitors or potential competitors, business information such as
14
supplier lists, customer lists, cost-of-goods sold, pricing, manufacturing
15
agreements, and other, similar information are confidential and must be protected
16
from disclosure, and with highly sensitive information, safeguards are necessary to
17
limit the disclosure of such information to opposing parties and/or other
18
competitors in the market so as to avoid competitive harm.
19
The threshold issues in the complaint center on copyright infringement
20
allegations. Resolution of these issues and damages analysis necessarily require
21
evidence of, but not limited to, customer lists, cost of manufactures, supplier lists,
22
sales data, and channels of trade.
23
24
25
B.
The Proposed Protective Order Focuses on the Protection of
Commercially Sensitive Business Information
Federal Rule Civil Procedure Rule 26(c)(7) permits the grant of a protective
26
order upon a showing of good cause, and provides that the protection of a trade
27
secret or other confidential commercial information is a proper basis for the
28
issuance of a protective order. The party seeking such an order must demonstrate a
2
1
particular and specific need for the protective order. Gary v. Rodewald, 133
2
F.R.D. 39, 40 (N.D. Cal. 1990).
3
A protective order that focuses on preventing disclosure of particular
4
information, e.g. confidential business information, where disclosure would “likely
5
cause serious harm,” is supported by good cause. Hayden v. Siemens Medical
6
Systems, Inc., 106 F.R.D. 551, 556, (S.D.N.Y. 1985). To support a showing of
7
good cause, however, a protective order must be sufficiently tailored in the
8
information it seeks to protect, e.g. by designating certain classes or types of
9
information. Id.
A “blanket” protective order, as opposed to a broader “umbrella” protective
11
order, “permits the parties to protect the documents that they in good faith believe
12
MILORD & ASSOCIATES, PC
10517 West Pico Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 226-7878
10
contain trade secrets or other confidential commercial information. Such
13
protective orders are routinely agreed to by the parties and approved by the courts
14
in commercial litigation, especially in cases between direct competitors.” Bayer
15
AG and Miles Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., 162 F.R.D. 456, 465, (S.D.N.Y.
16
1995).
17
As competitors or potential competitors, the parties’ proposed protective
18
order was drafted to protect the confidentiality and disclosure of each party’s
19
confidential business information and to provide extra precautions on the
20
disclosure of highly sensitive business information, as defined below, and as
21
balanced against the need and use for such information to prosecute and defend
22
this action. Confidential information, whether designated CONFIDENTIAL or
23
CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, may open to challenge by any
24
party, any third party, or the public.
25
C.
26
Based on the foregoing demonstration of good cause in support of the
27
Protective Order, this Order should be granted by the Court to protect that parties’
28
confidential business information.
Conclusion
3
1
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER
In accordance with Rule 26(c) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure the parties
3
stipulate and agree, through their respective counsel, to the entry of a protective
4
order governing the disclosure during pretrial discovery and the subsequent
5
handling of trade secret information, proprietary information, other confidential
6
commercial, financial or personal information, and documents containing any such
7
information as follows:
8
1.
INITIAL DESIGNATION.
9
1.1
Confidentiality Designations. Information (regardless of how it is
generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under
11
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause
12
MILORD & ASSOCIATES, PC
10517 West Pico Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 226-7878
10
Statement shall be referred to as “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.”
13
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may be designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or
14
“CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as follows:
15
a.
CONFIDENTIAL designation.
A party or non-party may
16
designate material CONFIDENTIAL only if it deems that a reasonable basis exists
17
for limiting dissemination of the material under the standards of Rule 26 and that
18
the material contains confidential and/or proprietary commercial information that
19
is not generally available to the public
20
b.
CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY designation.
21
A party or non-party may only designate material CONFIDENTIAL-
22
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY if it deems that disclosure of such material to
23
another person or party would be injurious to the commercial interests of the
24
designating entity under the standards of Rule 26 and that the material contains
25
highly propriety technical or trade secret or business information so that the risk of
26
improper use or disclosure to another party outweighs the right of that party to
27
review such information.
28
1.2
Produced Documents. A party producing documents that it believes
4
1
constitute or contain CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION shall produce copies
2
bearing a label designating such material CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-
3
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY. As used herein, the term “documents” includes all
4
writings or other media on which information is recorded and other electronic files
5
and tangible things subject to production under the Federal Rules of Civil
6
Procedure.
7
Any and all documents, information, or materials provided by a party for the
purpose of settlement discussion prior to the entry of this Order by the Court shall
9
be deemed CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY unless otherwise
10
designated or agreed to, in writing, by the parties. Notwithstanding any other
11
provisions of this Order, no such documents, information, or materials may be
12
MILORD & ASSOCIATES, PC
10517 West Pico Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 226-7878
8
disclosed, shared, or otherwise used during any part of this case unless introduced
13
again by the same providing party under this Order.
14
1.3
Interrogatory Answers. If a party answering an interrogatory
15
believes in good faith under the criteria set forth in Paragraph 1.1 above that its
16
answer contains CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, it shall set forth its answer in
17
a separate document that is produced and designated as CONFIDENTIAL or
18
CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY in the same manner as a
19
produced document under subparagraph 1.2. The answers to interrogatories should
20
make reference to the separately produced document containing the answer, but
21
such document should not be attached to the interrogatories.
22
1.4
Inspections of Documents. In the event a party elects to produce
23
files and records for inspection and the requesting party elects to inspect them, no
24
designation of CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION need be made in advance of the
25
inspection. For purposes of such inspection, all materials produced shall be
26
considered as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION unless the parties agree, in
27
writing, otherwise. If the inspecting party selects specified documents to be
28
copied, the producing party shall be treated as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
5
1
until 10 days have elapsed from the time the producing party is provided copies of
2
the selected documents, during which time the producing party may designate such
3
documents as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION in accordance with Section 1.1.
4
1.5
Deposition Transcripts. Portions of testimony taken at a deposition
5
or conference and any corresponding exhibits may be designated as
6
CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL–ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY by making
7
a statement to that effect on the record at the deposition or other proceeding.
8
Arrangements shall be made with the court reporter transcribing such proceeding
9
to separately bind such portions of the transcript containing information designated
as CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL–ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY and
11
label such portions appropriately. For convenience, if a deposition transcript
12
MILORD & ASSOCIATES, PC
10517 West Pico Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 226-7878
10
contains repeated references to CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION which cannot
13
conveniently be segregated from non-CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, the
14
entire transcript may be marked by the reporter as CONFIDENTIAL or
15
CONFIDENTIAL–ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.
16
A party may also designate information disclosed at a deposition as
17
CONFIDENTIAL and/or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY by
18
notifying all parties in writing, within 30 days of receipt of the transcript, of the
19
specific pages and lines designated as such. Each party shall attach a copy of such
20
written statement to the face of each transcript in its possession, custody or control.
21
For 30 days after receipt of the transcript, depositions shall be treated as
22
CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, but after that period any portions
23
not designated as CONFIDENTIAL and/or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’
24
EYES ONLY may be disclosed.
25
1.6
Multi-page Documents. A party may designate all pages of an
26
integrated, multi-page document, including a deposition transcript, interrogatory
27
answers, and/or responses to document requests, as CONFIDENTIAL
28
INFORMATION by placing the label specified in subparagraph 1.2 on the first
6
1
page of the document. If a party wishes to designate only certain portions of an
2
integrated, multi-page document as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, it should
3
designate such portions immediately below the label on the first page of the
4
document and place the label specified in subparagraph 1.2 on each page of the
5
document containing CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.
6
1.7
Inadvertent Failures to Designate. An inadvertent failure to
7
designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the right
8
to secure protection under this Protective Order for such material, provided that the
9
designating party promptly notifies the Receiving Party, in writing, of its failure to
properly designate the qualified information and corrects the designation after
11
discovery of such inadvertent failure. Upon timely correction of a designation, the
12
MILORD & ASSOCIATES, PC
10517 West Pico Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 226-7878
10
Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated
13
in accordance with the provisions of this Protective Order.
14
2.
HANDLING PRIOR TO TRIAL.
15
2.1
Disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL Material. Materials designated
16
CONFIDENTIAL or information derived therefrom may be disclosed, shown,
17
made available, or communicated in any way only to the following persons:
18
a.
The parties and employees of the parties, but only to the extent
19
necessary to participate in, assist in and monitor the progress of this Action and for
20
no other purpose;
21
b.
Qualified persons taking testimony involving CONFIDENTIAL
22
INFORMATION, and necessary stenographic, videographic, and clerical personnel
23
thereof;
24
c.
Consultants or experts and their staff who are employed for the
25
purposes of this litigation who have signed the “Written Assurance”
26
acknowledgement (Attachment A);
27
d.
The court and the court’s staff;
28
e.
The author, addressees and recipients of the documents or any
7
1
person who would have had access to such information by virtue of his/her
2
employment; and for whom disclosure is reasonably necessary,
3
f.
any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting
4
personnel, mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement
5
discussions.
6
g.
Outside counsel for the parties to this litigation and/or the
insurance carriers for the parties to the litigation, including persons working solely
8
in secretarial, clerical, and paralegal capacities, and who are providing assistance to
9
counsel in this Action, and/or claims representatives and/or claims adjustors, upon
10
the condition that such CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION not be used in policy
11
issuance determinations and be immediately destroyed by the insurance carriers
12
MILORD & ASSOCIATES, PC
10517 West Pico Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 226-7878
7
upon completion of the instant litigation;
13
h.
Third-parties specifically retained to assist outside counsel in
14
copying, imaging, and/or coding of documents but for that purpose only, provided
15
that all such confidential documents are kept and maintained in a separate and
16
secure place and that the third party retained to copy, image, or code confidential
17
documents is not currently performing any services, either as an employee,
18
consultant, or otherwise for any competitor of either party to this Action or for one
19
having any interest adverse to either party to this Action;
20
21
22
i.
Any other person as to whom the parties previously agree in
writing.
2.2
Disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
23
Material. Material or documents designated as CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’
24
EYES ONLY may be shown to the persons listed in Sections 2.1(b) through (i).
25
2.3
Use of CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. Individuals who are
26
authorized to review CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION pursuant to this
27
Protective Order shall hold the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and its
28
contents in confidence and shall not divulge it, either verbally or in writing, except
8
1
as expressly permitted by this Protective Order, unless authorized to do so by a
2
further order of this Court or as specifically required by law.
3
2.4
Unauthorized Disclosures. In the event of disclosure of
4
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION other than as authorized in this Protective
5
Order, counsel for the party responsible for the disclosure shall (1) notify all
6
parties of the unauthorized disclosures, (2) make every effort to prevent further
7
disclosure, including retrieving disclosed materials and copies of such materials,
8
and (3) request that the persons to whom the unauthorized disclosure was made
9
sign a “Written Assurance” acknowledgement (Attachment “A”). Upon written
10
stipulation or motion, in accordance with Local Rule 37, the Court may order such
11
further and additional relief as it deems necessary and just.
MILORD & ASSOCIATES, PC
10517 West Pico Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 226-7878
12
2.5
Court Filings. Any CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION (or
13
documents containing CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION) to be filed with the
14
Court shall be filed under seal pursuant to the procedures set forth in Local Rule
15
79-5, or pursuant to such other procedures for filing under seal as the Court may
16
order or allow. The parties agree that exhibits provided to any jury impaneled in
17
this Action shall be provided without the CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL–
18
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY stamp.
19
3.
20
which is subject to this Protective Order may be marked and used as trial exhibits
21
by either party, subject to terms and conditions as imposed by the trial court upon
22
application by the designating party.
23
4.
24
survive the final termination of this Action and shall protect all retained materials
25
that have remained confidential through final termination of the case. Upon final
26
termination of this Action, counsel for the parties may each retain one copy of all
27
pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal
28
memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney
HANDLING DURING TRIAL. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
HANDLING AFTER FINAL DISPOSITION. This Protective Order shall
9
1
work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials
2
contain CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. Counsel shall destroy or assemble
3
and return to each other materials designated as CONFIDENTIAL and/or
4
CONFIDENTIAL–ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY and all copies or summaries
5
thereof.
6
5.
7
or disclosure by a party of material: (1) obtained lawfully by a party hereto other
8
than through discovery in this Action, from a person who, to the best of such
9
party’s knowledge, was not at the time such materials were obtained by such party
RESTRICTIONS. Nothing herein shall impose any restriction on the use
under a duty (contractual or otherwise) to maintain such materials in confidence;
11
(2) that is public knowledge or became public knowledge after disclosure under
12
MILORD & ASSOCIATES, PC
10517 West Pico Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 226-7878
10
this Protective Order (other than through an act or omission or a person receiving
13
material under this Protective Order).
14
6.
15
the right of any party: (i) to request re-designation of material as
16
CONFIDENTIAL, CONFIDENTIAL–ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, or neither;
17
(ii) upon written stipulation, in accordance with Local Rule 37, to request the
18
Court’s ruling on whether a document or information is CONFIDENTIAL,
19
CONFIDENTIAL–ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Material, or whether its use
20
should be restricted; (iii) to present a motion to the Court under FRCP 26(c) for a
21
separate protective order as to any document or information, including restrictions
22
differing from those specified herein. Any challenge to a confidentiality
23
designation shall be initiated pursuant to Local Rule 37 and the burden of
24
persuasion in any such challenge shall be on the party who designated the material
25
as CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL–ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY. The
26
Protective Order shall not be deemed to prejudice the parties in any way in any
27
future application for modification of this Protective Order.
28
7.
OTHER REQUESTS. This Protective Order shall be without prejudice to
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED
10
1
PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION. If a party is served with a subpoena or
2
a court order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of any information
3
or items designated in this Action as CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL–
4
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY that party must:
5
6
a.
promptly notify, in writing, the designating party. Such notification
shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order;
7
b.
promptly notify, in writing, the party who caused the subpoena or
8
order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the
9
subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall
10
include a copy of this Protective Order; and
11
c.
cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be
MILORD & ASSOCIATES, PC
10517 West Pico Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 226-7878
12
pursued by the designating party whose CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may
13
be affected.
14
If the designating party timely seeks a protective order, the party served with
15
the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this
16
action as CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL–ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
17
before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued,
18
unless the party has obtained the designating party’s permission. The designating
19
party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of its
20
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and nothing in these provisions should be
21
construed as authorizing or encouraging any party in this Action to disobey a
22
lawful directive from another court.
23
8.
24
information under this Protective Order shall maintain such material and
25
information secured and shall exercise the same standard of care with respect to
26
storage, custody, use and dissemination of the material as they exercise for their
27
own proprietary information, but in no event shall the standard be less than that of
28
a reasonable person.
CUSTODY. All Receiving Parties of CONFIDENTIAL material and
11
1
This Protective Order shall be binding on the parties pending entry by the Court.
2
3
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
4
5
Dated: November 29, 2017
MILORD & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
By: /s/ Milord A. Keshishian
Milord A. Keshishian
Attorneys for Plaintiff
L.A. GEM & JEWELRY DESIGN, INC.
6
7
8
9
10
Dated: November 29, 2017
11
By: /s/ Mark J. Kesten
Mark J. Kesten
Attorneys for Defendant
NJS.COM LLC, d/b/a
NAMEJEWELRYSPOT
12
MILORD & ASSOCIATES, PC
10517 West Pico Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 226-7878
MARC J. KESTEN, P.L.
13
14
15
ORDERED.
D
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
DATED: November 30, 2017
By: ________________________
__________________________
_
17
E McDerm
Honorable John E. McDermott
United States Magistrate Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12
1
2
3
Attestation Pursuant to L.R. 5-4.3.4(a)(2)(i)
I herby attest that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing
is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.
4
5
6
Dated: November 29, 2017
/s/ Milord A. Keshishian
Milord A. Keshishian
7
8
9
10
11
MILORD & ASSOCIATES, PC
10517 West Pico Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 226-7878
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13
1
EXHIBIT A
2
WRITTEN ASSURANCE
3
I, _______________________________________________ (print name),
reside at ___________________________________, in the City of
5
______________, ____________. I am employed by and/or affiliated with
6
___________________, with a business address of
7
________________________________________, in the City of
8
______________, ____________. I have read and understand the Stipulated
9
Protective Order filed in the case of L.A. Gem & Jewelry Design, Inc. v. NJS.com,
10
LLC, et al., United States District Court Case CV 17-2747 BRO (JEMx). I agree
11
to comply with and be bound by the provisions of the Stipulated Protective Order.
12
MILORD & ASSOCIATES, PC
10517 West Pico Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 226-7878
4
I will not divulge Confidential Material and/or Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only
13
Material (as those terms are defined in the Stipulated Protective Order) to persons
14
other than those specifically authorized by the Stipulated Protective Order. I will
15
not copy or use, except solely for the purpose of this litigation, any information
16
protected by the Stipulated Protective Order except as expressly permitted by the
17
18
19
Court.
Executed at __________________, ___________________ (insert city and
state), this _____ day of _______________, 201__.
20
21
______________________________
Signature
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
14
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?