Jessie A. Valladares v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 10

(In Chambers) Order REMANDING Case to State Court by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. On April 24, 2017, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause ("OSC") why this case should not be remanded to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dkt. # 8. The Court raised concerns that the Complaint did not satisfy the amount in controversy requirement of diversity jurisdiction. Id. Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. filed a timely response to the OSC and indicated that it would not con test the Courts finding regarding the amount in controversy. Dkt. # 9. Because Defendant concedes that the amount in controversy is not satisfied in this case, the Court REMANDS to state court and CLOSES the federal case.Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (pso)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

CV 17-2844 PSG (PLAx)

Title

Valladares v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Present: The Honorable

Date

May 17, 2017

Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge

Wendy Hernandez

Not Reported

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s):

Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):

Not Present

Not Present

Proceedings (In Chambers):

Order REMANDING Case to State Court

On April 24, 2017, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) why this case
should not be remanded to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dkt. # 8. The
Court raised concerns that the Complaint did not satisfy the amount in controversy requirement
of diversity jurisdiction. Id. Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. filed a timely response to
the OSC and indicated that it would not contest the Court’s finding regarding the amount in
controversy. Dkt. # 9.
Because Defendant concedes that the amount in controversy is not satisfied in this case,
the Court REMANDS to state court and CLOSES the federal case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

AB for WH

CV-90 (10/08)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1