Aaron A. Correa v. Pacific Maritime Association et al

Filing 50

JUDGMENT RE: DEFENDANT PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court granted Defendant Pacific Maritime Association's Motion for Summary Judgment (joined by Defendant International Longshore and Warehouse Union) 31 . IT IS ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED THAT JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants. Plaintiff's action against Defendants is dismissed in its entirety. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

1
2

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

3

JS-6

4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

AARON A. CORREA,

11

Plaintiff,

12

15
16

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT RE:
DEFENDANT PACIFIC MARITIME
ASSOCIATION’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

vs.

13
14

Case No. 2:17-cv-03060-AB-FFM

PACIFIC MARITIME
ASSOCIATION, a California
corporation, and INTERNATIONAL
LONGSHORE AND WAREHOUSE
UNION,

17

Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///

28

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

1
2

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Defendant Pacific Maritime Association’s (“PMA”) Motion for Summary

3

Judgment (“Motion”) as to Plaintiff Aaron A. Correa’s (“Plaintiff”) causes of action

4

as pled in the operative Complaint was joined by Defendant International

5

Longshore and Warehouse Union (collectively with PMA, “Defendants”) and came

6

before the Court for hearing May 25, 2018. PMA’s Motion sought dismissal

7

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 of all of Plaintiff’s claims under the

8

Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (“USERRA”) and

9

the California Military and Veterans Code § 394(a) because no genuine dispute of

10

any material fact exists and Plaintiff’s claims fail as a matter of law.

11

The Court, having considered the parties’ moving, opposing, and reply

12

papers, and the evidentiary record as a whole (including the reasons set forth in the

13

Statement of Uncontroverted Facts), granted the Motion for the reasons set forth in

14

its Order.

15

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED

16

THAT JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED against Plaintiff and in favor of

17

Defendants. Plaintiff’s action against Defendants is dismissed in its entirety.

18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21
22

Date: July 03, 2018

By: _______________________________
Hon. André Birotte Jr.
U.S. District Court Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT