Maher Terminals LLC v. M V SM Long Beach

Filing 27

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Fed. R. Civ. P. §41(a) by Judge Manuel L. Real, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 26 . Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice filed by the parties, the Court hereby orders that the entire action be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (smo)

Alan Nakazawa, State Bar No. 84670
[e-mail]
2 COGSWELL NAKAZAWA & CHANG, LLP
444 West Ocean Boulevard, Suite 1410
3 Long Beach, California 90802-8131
Telephone [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
1

5

Attorneys for Defendants M/V SM LONG BEACH, M/V SM BUSAN, M/V SM
SHANGHAI, M/V SM NINGBO and M/V SM YANTIAN and Claimant KOREA
SHIPPING CORPORATION, appearing specially under Supplemental Admiralty
7 Rule E(8) to defend the in rem claims
6

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

MAHER TERMINALS LLC,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
M/V SM LONG BEACH, formerly
)
known as M/V Hanjin Xiamen, IMO )
No. 9312755, its freights, engines,
)
apparel, appurtenances, and tackle;
)
M/V SM BUSAN, f.k.a. M/V Hanjin )
Tianjin, IMO No. 9312767, its freights, )
engines, apparel, appurtenances, and )
tackle; M/V SM SHANGHAI, f.k.a. )
Hanjin Bremerhaven, IMO No.
)
9312779, its freights, engines, apparel, )
appurtenances, and tackle; M/V SM
)
NINGBO, f.k.a. Hanjin Budapest, IMO )
No. 9312937, its freights, engines,
)
apparel, appurtenances, and tackle;
)
M/V SM YANTIAN, f.k.a. Hanjin Port )
Kelang, IMO No. 9312949, its freights, )
engines, apparel, appurtenances, and )
tackle; M/V SM KWANGYANG,
)
f.k.a. Hanjin Mumbai, IMO No.
)
9347425, its freights, engines, apparel, )
appurtenances, and tackle;
)
)
Defendants in rem.
)
_______________________________ )

CASE NO.: 2:17-CV-03195-R (AGRx)
IN ADMIRALTY
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF
ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
[Fed. R. Civ. P. §41(a]

26
27
28

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice filed by the parties,
1
2

the Court hereby orders that the entire action be dismissed with prejudice, each
party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7

Dated: July 10, 2017

____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
-2-