Araksi Zhamkochyan v. CIT Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 17

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal pursuant toFRCP 41(a)(1)(A) jointly 16 filed by the parties, finds thatthis action shall be dismissed with prejudice, in its entirety. Each party is to bear her or its own costs and attorneys' fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JS-6 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARAKSI ZHAMKOCHYAN, an individual, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 v. CIT BANK, N.A.,; AND WAGEWORKS, INC., a corporation, CASE NO. 2:17-cv-3379-ODW xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Complaint Filed: May 4, 2017 Trial Date: None Judge: Hon. Otis D. Wright, II Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal pursuant to 2 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) jointly filed by the parties, finds that 3 this action shall be dismissed with prejudice, in its entirety. Each party is to bear 4 her or its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. ED. 7 8 9 August 30, 2017 Dated: _____________ Honorable Otis D. Wright, II Otis D. Wright, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?