Araksi Zhamkochyan v. CIT Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 17

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal pursuant toFRCP 41(a)(1)(A) jointly 16 filed by the parties, finds thatthis action shall be dismissed with prejudice, in its entirety. Each party is to bear her or its own costs and attorneys' fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

JS-6

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ARAKSI ZHAMKOCHYAN, an
individual,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15
16

v.
CIT BANK, N.A.,; AND
WAGEWORKS, INC., a
corporation,

CASE NO. 2:17-cv-3379-ODW
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE
Complaint Filed: May 4, 2017
Trial Date:
None
Judge:
Hon. Otis D. Wright, II

Defendants.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

1

The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal pursuant to

2

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) jointly filed by the parties, finds that

3

this action shall be dismissed with prejudice, in its entirety. Each party is to bear

4

her or its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
ED.

7
8
9

August 30, 2017
Dated: _____________

Honorable Otis D. Wright, II
Otis D. Wright,

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE