Imran Khan v. Ben Bridge Jewelers et al

Filing 16

MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge John F. Walter: As a result of the parties' failure to file the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as required by the Court's Order of June 22, 2017, this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Scheduling Conference, currently on calendar for August 7, 2017, is VACATED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

JS-6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL
Case No.

CV 17-3427-JFW(AGRx)

Title:

Imran Khan -v- Ben Bridge Jewelers, et al.

Date: August 2, 2017

PRESENT:
HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Shannon Reilly
Courtroom Deputy

None Present
Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:
None
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS):

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
None

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

As a result of the parties’ failure to file the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as required by the Court's
Order of June 22, 2017, this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Scheduling
Conference, currently on calendar for August 7, 2017, is VACATED. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b);
see also Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 986-88 (9th Cir. 1999); Ferdik v. Bonzelet,
963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992).
IT IS SO ORDERED.

(Rev. 1/24/12)

Initials of Deputy Clerk sr