Ronnie R. Wadell v. R. Madden
Filing
21
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge R. Gary Klausner for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 18 . (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing this action with prejudice. (iva)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
Petitioner,
11
12
13
14
Case No. CV 17-3715-RGK (KK)
RONNIE R. WADDELL,
v.
R. MADDEN, Warden,
Respondents.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
15
16
17
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ
18
of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the
19
United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those
20
portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the
21
findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
22
In his objections to the Report, Petitioner also requests an evidentiary
23
hearing. However, in habeas proceedings, “an evidentiary hearing is not required
24
on issues that can be resolved by reference to the state court record.” Totten v.
25
Merkle, 137 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 1998); see also Earp v. Ornoski, 431 F.3d 1158,
26
1173 (9th Cir. 2005). “It is axiomatic that when issues can be resolved with
27
reference to the state court record, an evidentiary hearing becomes nothing more
28
than a futile exercise.” Totten, 137 F.3d at 1176. Here, the Magistrate Judge
1
concluded all of Petitioner’s claims could be resolved by reference to the state
2
court record. Accordingly, the Court denies Petitioner’s request for an evidentiary
3
hearing.
4
5
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the
Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing this action with prejudice.
6
7
8
9
Dated: October 23, 2017
HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?