Ronnie R. Wadell v. R. Madden

Filing 21

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge R. Gary Klausner for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 18 . (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing this action with prejudice. (iva)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 Petitioner, 11 12 13 14 Case No. CV 17-3715-RGK (KK) RONNIE R. WADDELL, v. R. MADDEN, Warden, Respondents. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ 18 of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the 19 United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those 20 portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the 21 findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 22 In his objections to the Report, Petitioner also requests an evidentiary 23 hearing. However, in habeas proceedings, “an evidentiary hearing is not required 24 on issues that can be resolved by reference to the state court record.” Totten v. 25 Merkle, 137 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 1998); see also Earp v. Ornoski, 431 F.3d 1158, 26 1173 (9th Cir. 2005). “It is axiomatic that when issues can be resolved with 27 reference to the state court record, an evidentiary hearing becomes nothing more 28 than a futile exercise.” Totten, 137 F.3d at 1176. Here, the Magistrate Judge 1 concluded all of Petitioner’s claims could be resolved by reference to the state 2 court record. Accordingly, the Court denies Petitioner’s request for an evidentiary 3 hearing. 4 5 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing this action with prejudice. 6 7 8 9 Dated: October 23, 2017 HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?