Securities and Exchange Commission v. Adrew T.E. Coldicutt et al
Filing
17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY AN ORDER COMPELLING COMPLIANCE WITH INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENAS SHOULD NOT BE ISSUED by Judge Christina A. Snyder. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC") Application for an Order to Show Cause and an Application for Order Compelling Compliance with Investigative Subpoenas against Respondents Andrew T.E. Coldicutt and the Law Office of Andrew Coldicutt 16 is GRANTED. Respondents shall appear on 7/31/2017 10:00 AM before Judg e Christina A. Snyder, to show cause, if there be any, why this Court should not issue an Order ("Order Compelling Compliance"). Response to Order to Show Cause due by no later than 5:00 PM on 7/17/2017. Reply papers in support of the issuance of the Order Compelling Complaint shall be filed by the Respondents no later than 5:00 PM on 7/24/2017. See document for further details. (gk)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
LYNN M. DEAN (Cal. Bar No. 205562)
Email: deanl@sec.gov
ROBERTO A. TERCERO (Cal. Bar No. 143760)
Email: terceror@sec.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Securities and Exchange Commission
Michele Wein Layne, Regional Director
Alka N. Patel, Associate Regional Director
Amy Jane Longo Regional Trial Counsel
444 S. Flower Street, Suite 900
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: (323) 965-3998
Facsimile: (213) 443-1904
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
Western Division
12
13
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Applicant,
14
15
16
17
18
vs.
ANDREW T.E. COLDICUTT and
LAW OFFICE OF ANDREW
COLDICUTT,
Case No. 2:17-cv-03888-CAS (AFMx)
XXXXXXXXXX
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY AN ORDER
COMPELLING COMPLIANCE
WITH INVESTIGATIVE
SUBPOENAS SHOULD NOT BE
ISSUED
Respondents.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:17cv-03888-CAS (AFMx)
1
The Applicant, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), having filed
2
an Application for an Order to Show Cause and an Application for Order Compelling
3
Compliance with Investigative Subpoenas against Respondents Andrew T.E.
4
Coldicutt and the Law Office of Andrew Coldicutt (collectively, “Respondents”), the
5
Court having considered the Application and documents filed in support thereof, and
6
good cause having been shown, the Court being fully briefed in the matter, and there
7
being no just cause for delay:
8
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the SEC’s Application for an Order to Show
9
Cause Why an Order Compelling Compliance with Investigative Subpoenas should
10
11
not be issued is GRANTED.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on July 31, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., or as soon
12
thereafter as the parties can be heard, the Respondents shall appear before the
13
Honorable Christina A. Snyder, United States District Court, in Courtroom 8D, 8th
14
Floor, located at United States Courthouse, 350 West First Street, Los Angeles,
15
California 90012-4565, to show cause, if there be any, why this Court should not
16
issue an Order (“Order Compelling Compliance”) that:
17
a)
finds that (1) Respondents have failed to comply with the Court’s
18
June 8, 2017 Order [Dkt. 15]; (2) Respondents have failed to meet their burden to
19
establish that the documents responsive to the SEC’s May 2016 investigative
20
subpoenas that were withheld on the grounds that they are privileged were in fact
21
privileged, and (3) that Respondents have therefore waived any such privilege; and
22
b)
directs the Respondents to produce without any further delay all
23
documents responsive to the SEC’s May 2016 investigative subpoenas that were
24
withheld on the grounds that they are privileged.
25
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any papers in opposition to the issuance of
26
said Order Compelling Compliance shall be filed by the Respondents with this Court
27
and served on the SEC’s Los Angeles Regional Office at 444 S. Flower Street, 9th
28
1
Case No. 2:17cv-03888-CAS (AFMx))
1
Floor, Los Angeles, California 90071, such that they arrive no later than 5:00
2
p.m. (PT), on July 17, 2017.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any reply papers in support of the issuance
4
of said Order Compelling Compliance shall be filed by the Respondents with this
5
Court and served on the Respondents’ counsel, Estevan R. Lucero, Lucero Law Firm
6
APC, 3517 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92108, such that they
7
arrive no later than 5:00 p.m. (PT), on July 24, 2017.
8
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service of this Order to Show Cause, and
9
any papers in opposition to the issuance of said Order, or any reply papers, may be
10
accomplished by electronic mail, facsimile, United Parcel Service or personal service.
11
12
13
14
15
July 7
Dated: ____________, 2017
______
HON. CHRISTINA A. SNYDER
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 2:17cv-03888-CAS (AFMx))
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?