Maria Murrillo v. WestRock Services, Inc. et al

Filing 18

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Having reviewed the parties Stipulation and [Proposed] Protective Order 17 , filed concurrently herewith, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby makes the Protective Order an Order of the Court. (kl)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Joseph M. Lovretovich (SBN 73403) Eric J. Palmer (SBN 231207) Christina R. Manalo (SBN 297718) JML LAW 21052 Oxnard Street Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone: (818) 610-8800 Facsimile: (818) 610-3030 Attorneys for Plaintiff MARIA MURILLO Shagha Balali (SBN 245061) BalaliS@jacksonlewis.com Eric J. Gitig (SBN 307547) Eric.Gitig@jacksonlewis.com JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 725 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2500 Los Angeles, California 90017-5408 Telephone: (213) 689-0404 Facsimile: (213) 689-0430 Attorneys for Defendant WESTROCK SERVICES, INC. (previously known as and erroneously sued as ROCK-TENN SERVICES, INC.) 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 MARIA MURILLO, 19 Plaintiff, 20 21 22 23 CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-04096 PSG (JEMx) PROTECTIVE ORDER vs. ROCK-TENN SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation; ROCK-TENN COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Complaint Filed: April 18, 2017 Defendants. 24 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-04906 PSG (JEMx) 1 PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 ORDER 2 3 Having reviewed the parties Stipulation and [Proposed] Protective Order, filed 4 concurrently herewith, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby makes the Protective 5 Order an Order of the Court. 6 . 7 8 SO ORDERED: 9 10 09/06/2017 DATED: ________________ 11 ____________________________ ______________________ _ MCDERMOTT HON. JOHN E. MCDERM United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 4837-0489-8126, v. 1 28 CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-04906 PSG (JEMx) 2 PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?