Nicholas Johnson v. The City of Los Angeles et al

Filing 128

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Pursuant to Rules 54 and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. THAT in accordance with the verdict form dated February 22, 2019, final judgment be, and hereby is, entered in favor of the Defendants City of Los Angeles, Thomas Malloy, Fidel Gonzalez, and Phillip Clayson; 2. THAT Plaintiff shall take nothing; and 3. THAT Defendants City of Los Angeles, Thomas Malloy, Fidel Gonzalez, and Phillip Clayson shall recover their costs of suit herein as determined by the Clerk of the Court. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. (see document for further details) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ) Thomas Malloy, Fidel Gonzalez, Phillip Clayson and DOES 4 through ) ) 10, ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ NICHOLAS JOHNSON, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NO. CV 17-04104-KS [Assigned: Magistrate Judge Hon. Karen L. Stevenson] JUDGMENT JUDGMENT 20 21 This action came on regularly for trial on February 19, 2019 in Courtroom 580 of the 22 United States District Court, Central District of California, the Honorable Karen L. 23 Stevenson, United States Magistrate Judge presiding.1 24 represented by Christian F. Pereira and Melissa G. Fulgencio. The Defendants City of Los Plaintiff Nicholas Johnson was 25 26 27 28 1 On September 1, 2017, the parties consented to have this matter assigned to Magistrate Judge Stevenson for final disposition. (See Dkt. Nos. 17, 18, 19.) 1 1 Angeles, Thomas Malloy, Fidel Gonzalez, and Phillip Clayson were represented by Deputy 2 City Attorney Matthew P. Mattis. 3 A jury of eight (8) persons were regularly empaneled and sworn. Witnesses were 4 sworn and testified. Documentary evidence was introduced and admitted into evidence. 5 After hearing the evidence and arguments of counsel, the jury was duly instructed by the 6 Court and the cause was submitted to the jury. The jury deliberated and thereafter returned 7 its unanimous verdict on February 22, 2019 in favor of Defendants City of Los Angeles, 8 Thomas Malloy, Fidel Gonzalez, and Phillip Clayson on all claims, which said verdict was 9 filed with the clerk and entered upon the minutes. 10 IT APPEARING BY REASON OF SAID VERDICT THAT Defendants City of 11 Los Angeles, Thomas Malloy, Fidel Gonzalez, and Phillip Clayson are entitled to final 12 judgment. 13 14 Accordingly, pursuant to Rules 54 and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 15 1. THAT in accordance with the verdict form dated February 22, 2019, final 16 judgment be, and hereby is, entered in favor of the Defendants City of Los 17 Angeles, Thomas Malloy, Fidel Gonzalez, and Phillip Clayson; 18 2. THAT Plaintiff shall take nothing; and 19 3. THAT Defendants City of Los Angeles, Thomas Malloy, Fidel Gonzalez, and 20 Phillip Clayson shall recover their costs of suit herein as determined by the Clerk 21 of the Court. 22 The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. 23 24 DATED: February 26, 2019 25 __________________________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ __________________________________ KAREN L. STEVENSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?