Craig Ross et al v. Timothy P. White et al

Filing 186

PARTIAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST CRAIG ROSS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Craig Ross shall take nothing by his complaint against Defendants. Ross's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, in their entirety, as to all Defendants. (lc) Modified on 6/13/2018 (lc).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

United States District Court
Central District of California

8
9
10
11

CRAIG ROSS, et al.
Plaintiffs,

12

v.

13
14

Case № 2:17-cv-04149-ODW (JC)
PARTIAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR
OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST

TIMOTHY P. WHITE, et al.,

CRAIG ROSS

Defendants.

15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiffs Craig Ross and Natalie Operstein initiated this suit on June 2, 2017.

20

(ECF No. 1.) Several groups of Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second

21

Amended Complaint. (ECF Nos. 87, 89, 119.) On April 20, 2018, the Court granted

22

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, without leave to amend, as it pertains to all of

23

Plaintiff Craig Ross’s claims. (Order, ECF No. 146.) On June 12, 2018, the Court

24

denied Ross’s Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF No. 185.)

25
26

//

27

//

28

//

1

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

2

1.

Craig Ross shall take nothing by his complaint against Defendants.

3

2.

Ross’s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, in their entirety,

4

as to all Defendants.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

June 12, 2018

8
9
10
11

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2