Evaristo Cortes v. Jerry Park et al

Filing 10

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing on or before September 6, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Cour t will consider the filing of the following as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond in writing, may result in the dismissal of the entire action - Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint by Plaintiff. See document for details. (smo)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

2:17-cv-04180-PSG-AFM

Title

Evaristo Cortes v. Jerry Park et al

Present: The Honorable

Date

August 23, 2017

Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge

Wendy Hernandez

Not Reported

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present

Not Present

Proceedings (In Chambers):

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing on or before September 6, 2017 why this
action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following as an
appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond in writing, may result in the dismissal of the
entire action.
X

Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint by Plaintiff.
Response to Complaint (Amended Complaint) along with Notice of Interested Parties pursuant to Local
Rule 7.1-1 by Defendant(s) OR Request for Entry of Default by Plaintiff.
REMOVALS: Copy of Answer filed in state court with proper title page as instructed on the Court’s
Standing Order along with Notice of Interested Parties pursuant to Local Rule 7.1-1 filed by Defendant(s)
OR other responsive pleading OR Request for Entry of Default by Plaintiff.
Request to Clerk for Entry of Default Judgment by Plaintiff.
Motion for Entry of Default Judgment by Plaintiff.

X

Plaintiff to serve ADA Packet on Defendants(s) and file a Proof of Service indicating that the ADA Packet
was served on Defendant(s). See Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation Dkt. #9.

Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7.15, oral argument will not be
heard in this matter unless so ordered by the Court.
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.5, one mandatory chambers copy of every electronically filed document must
be delivered no later than 12:00 p.m. on the following business day. Further, the mandatory chambers copy shall
comply with Local Rule 11-3.

CV-90 (10/08)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1