Alfredo Santibanez v. City of Los Angeles et al
Filing
95
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:By reason of dismissals, the rulings of the Court, and the special verdict, Defendant Officer David Bunch is entitled to judgment against Plaintiff Alfredo Santibanez. Now, therefore, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND D ECREED that Plaintiff Alfredo Santibanez recover nothing by reason of each and all his claims as set forth in the Complaint against Defendant Officer David Bunch and that Defendant shall recover his costs in accordance with Local Rule 54. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant on all claims. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
JS-6
1
2
NOTE: CHANGES HAVE BEEN
MADE TO THIS DOCUMENT
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
Central District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ALFREDO SANTIBANEZ, as an
individual,
Plaintiff
Case ā 2:17-cv-04189-ODW (JCx)
JUDGMENT
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES; OFFICER
DAVID BUNCH (#38552); and DOES 1
through 10, Inclusive,
Defendants.
18
19
This action came on regularly for trial on January 8, 2019, in Courtroom ā5Dā
20
of the United States District Court, Central District of California, Central Division, the
21
Honorable Otis D. Wright, II presiding. Plaintiff Alfredo Santibanez was represented
22
by attorneys Jamon Hicks and Aja M. Mann. Defendant Officer David Bunch was
23
represented by attorneys Colleen R. Smith and Cory M. Brente.
24
A jury of 8 persons was impaneled and sworn on January 8, 2019. Witnesses
25
were sworn and testified.
26
evidence and argument during a jury trial, the jury, in the above-entitled action,
27
unanimously found in favor of Defendant as reflected in the special verdict form. (See
28
Redacted Jury Verdict, ECF No. 89.)
On January 10, 2019, following the presentation of
1
By reason of dismissals, the rulings of the Court, and the special verdict,
2
Defendant Officer David Bunch is entitled to judgment against Plaintiff Alfredo
3
Santibanez.
4
Now, therefore, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that
5
Plaintiff Alfredo Santibanez recover nothing by reason of each and all his claims as
6
set forth in the Complaint against Defendant Officer David Bunch and that Defendant
7
shall recover his costs in accordance with Local Rule 54.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant on all claims. The Clerk of
the Court shall close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 23, 2019
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?