Alfredo Santibanez v. City of Los Angeles et al

Filing 95

JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:By reason of dismissals, the rulings of the Court, and the special verdict, Defendant Officer David Bunch is entitled to judgment against Plaintiff Alfredo Santibanez. Now, therefore, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND D ECREED that Plaintiff Alfredo Santibanez recover nothing by reason of each and all his claims as set forth in the Complaint against Defendant Officer David Bunch and that Defendant shall recover his costs in accordance with Local Rule 54. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant on all claims. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 NOTE: CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO THIS DOCUMENT 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court Central District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ALFREDO SANTIBANEZ, as an individual, Plaintiff Case ā„– 2:17-cv-04189-ODW (JCx) JUDGMENT v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; OFFICER DAVID BUNCH (#38552); and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive, Defendants. 18 19 This action came on regularly for trial on January 8, 2019, in Courtroom ā€œ5Dā€ 20 of the United States District Court, Central District of California, Central Division, the 21 Honorable Otis D. Wright, II presiding. Plaintiff Alfredo Santibanez was represented 22 by attorneys Jamon Hicks and Aja M. Mann. Defendant Officer David Bunch was 23 represented by attorneys Colleen R. Smith and Cory M. Brente. 24 A jury of 8 persons was impaneled and sworn on January 8, 2019. Witnesses 25 were sworn and testified. 26 evidence and argument during a jury trial, the jury, in the above-entitled action, 27 unanimously found in favor of Defendant as reflected in the special verdict form. (See 28 Redacted Jury Verdict, ECF No. 89.) On January 10, 2019, following the presentation of 1 By reason of dismissals, the rulings of the Court, and the special verdict, 2 Defendant Officer David Bunch is entitled to judgment against Plaintiff Alfredo 3 Santibanez. 4 Now, therefore, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that 5 Plaintiff Alfredo Santibanez recover nothing by reason of each and all his claims as 6 set forth in the Complaint against Defendant Officer David Bunch and that Defendant 7 shall recover his costs in accordance with Local Rule 54. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant on all claims. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. January 23, 2019 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?