Jitrade, Inc. v. Style in USA, Inc. et al

Filing 27

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT STYLE IN USA, INC.S MOTION TO DISMISS 25 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court STRIKES Defendant Style In USAs Motion to Dismiss. Defendant may file a motion to set aside entry of default on or before October 30, 2017. (lc). Modified on 10/3/2017 (lc).

O

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

United States District Court
Central District of California

8
9
10
11

JITRADE, INC.,

12
13
14
15
16

v.

Case No. 2:17-CV-04245-ODW-SK
Plaintiff,

STYLE IN USA, INC. d/b/a NADIA,
APPLEB, B-TWEEN, and 1 STYLE IN
USA; CALYSTA APPAREL, INC. d/b/a
SWAY; TREND NOTES, INC.;
BIGGERNBETTER, INC. d/b/a
ABEAUTY BY BNB; and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,

17

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT
STYLE IN USA, INC.’S MOTION TO
DISMISS [25]

Defendants.

18
19

I.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

INTRODUCTION

On June 7, 2017, Plaintiff Jitrade, Inc. (“Jitrade”) filed this action against
Defendants Style In USA, Inc. (“Style In USA”), Calysta Apparel, Inc., Trend Notes,
Inc., and Biggernbetter, Inc. alleging (1) copyright infringement; (2) vicarious
copyright infringement; and (3) contributory copyright infringement. (Compl., ECF
No. 1.) Before the Court is Style In USA’s Motion to Dismiss Jitrade’s Complaint
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 25.) Because the
Clerk has entered default against Style In USA, and they have not moved to set aside
entry of default, the Court STRIKES the Motion.
///

1

II.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

2

Jitrade is a California corporation that creates, purchases, and obtains rights to

3

two-dimensional graphic artworks for use on textiles and garments that are used in the

4

fashion industry. (Compl. 2.) Style In USA is a California corporation engaged in

5

work related to the fashion industry. (See Compl. ¶ 16.) Jitrade alleges that Style In

6

USA infringed on its copyright by creating and selling garments featuring Jitrade’s

7

textile design without its permission. (Compl. ¶ 27.)

8

Jitrade served the Complaint on Style In USA on July 25, 2017, and Style In

9

USA was required to file a responsive pleading by August 15, 2017. (Proof of

10

Service, ECF No. 19.) Style In USA did not file a responsive pleading by the

11

deadline, and on September 7, 2017, Jitrade requested the Clerk for entry of default.

12

(ECF No. 23.) The Clerk entered default against Style In USA on September 9, 2017,

13

at 8:24 A.M. (ECF No. 24.) Style In USA then moved to dismiss on September 9,

14

2017, at 9:53 A.M. (Mot., ECF No. 25.) Jitrade did not file an opposition to Style In

15

USA’s Motion to Dismiss.

16

III.

DISCUSSION

17

Once default has been entered against a defendant, they have “lost [their]

18

standing in court, cannot appear in any way, cannot adduce any evidence, and cannot

19

be heard at the final hearing.” Clifton v. Tomb, 21 F.2d 893, 897 (4th Cir. 1927)

20

(citation omitted); see also Great Am. Ins. Co. v. M.J. Menefee Const., Inc., No. CV F

21

06-0392-AWI-DLB, 2006 WL 2522408, at * 2 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2006) (“Entry of a

22

defendant’s default cuts off a defendant’s right to appear in an action . . .”). The

23

proper remedy for a defendant seeking to set aside a default and defend an action is to

24

file a motion to set aside entry of default pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

25

55(c). Warner Bros. Home Entertainment, Inc. v. Meyers, 13-cv-0980-SJO-VBK,

26

2013 WL 12142605, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2013). A defaulted defendant may only

27

file a motion to set aside the default by showing good cause. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

28

55(c); see also Clifton, 21 F.2d at 897 (stating that a defaulted party “should show

2

1

good cause before the default should be set aside”).

2

Style In USA’s Motion asserts that Jitrade’s Complaint should be dismissed

3

because it is duplicative of another pending suit concerning the same copyright

4

designs at issue here. (Mot. 3.)1 The Motion does not address Style In USA’s default

5

nor does it provide a showing of good cause as to why the Court should set aside

6

default. (See generally Mot.) Because Style In USA is a defaulted defendant, and has

7

not moved to set aside default, the Court STRIKES its Motion. See Warner Bros.,

8

2013 WL 12142605, at *1 (striking defendant’s motion to dismiss filed after Clerk

9

entered default).2
V.

10

CONCLUSION

11

For the reasons discussed above, the Court STRIKES Defendant Style In

12

USA’s Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 25.) Defendant may file a motion to set aside

13

entry of default on or before October 30, 2017.

14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
16

October 2, 2017

17
18

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 83-1.3, parties are required to promptly file a Notice of Related Civil
Cases with the Court should they become aware of two or more civil cases filed in this District
which: “(a) arise from the same or a closely related transaction, happening, or event; (b) call for
determination of the same or substantially related or similar questions of law and fact; or (c) for
other reasons would entail substantial duplication of labor if heard by different judges.” C.D. Cal.
L.R. 83-1.3.
2
Because the Court need not address the merits of the Motion, the Court also declines to take
Judicial Notice of the requested documents at this time. (ECF No. 26.)

3