Serenity Jones v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation Amtrak et al

Filing 10

ORDER Re Joint Motion for Stipulated Dismissal With Prejudice 9 by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell the Joint Motion for Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice between Plaintiff SERENITY JONES and Defendant NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, service mark AMTRAK is approved and this entire action and all parties are dismissed with prejudice. Both Plaintiff and Defendant will bear their own costs, expenses, and attorneys fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

1
2
3

JS-6

4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 SERENITY JONES,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER )
)
CORPORATION (AMTRAK);
)
AMTRAK; AND DOES 1 to 40,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 2:17-cv-04367-BRO-RAO
ORDER RE JOINT MOTION FOR
STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

Complaint Filed: February 2, 2017
Trial Date: None

19
20

The Court, having reviewed and approved the Joint Motion for Stipulated

21 Dismissal with Prejudice by and between Plaintiff SERENITY JONES and
22 Defendant NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, service mark
23 AMTRAK, orders as follows:
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
-1-

ORDER RE JOINT MOTION FOR STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

1

IT IS ORDERED THAT the Joint Motion for Stipulated Dismissal with

2 Prejudice between Plaintiff SERENITY JONES and Defendant NATIONAL
3 RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, service mark AMTRAK, is approved
4 and this entire action and all parties are dismissed with prejudice. Both Plaintiff and
5 Defendant will bear their own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7 DATED: September 8, 2017

By:

8

____
Honorable Beverly Reid O’Connell
United States District Court Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

ORDER RE JOINT MOTION FOR STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE