Lanard Toys Limited v. Target Corporation

Filing 110

PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING DEPOSITIONS OF TARGET EMPLOYEES by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT (See document for details.) (sbou)

1
2
3

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

LANARD TOYS LIMITED,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17

vs.
TARGET CORPORATION,
Defendant.

Case No.: 2:17-cv-04472-GW-JPR
Hon. George H. Wu
PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING
DEPOSITIONS OF TARGET
EMPLOYEES
Complaint Filed: June 15, 2017

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING DEPOSITIONS
Case No. 2:17-cv-04472-GW-JPR

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED based on Defendant Target Corporation’s ex parte

1
2

application and the materials submitted therewith, Plaintiff’s opposition and

3

accompanying materials, and the November 5, 2018 oral argument, that the protective

4

order sought by Target Corporation related to Plaintiff Lanard Toys Limited’s noticed

5

depositions of Elaine Knodt, Amy Wokerstorfer, Sheila Shor, and Michael Kroll is

6

GRANTED in part, with the following provisions:
1)

7
8

The four depositions as noticed in the original deposition notices dated

October 18, 2018 are taken off calendar;
2)

9

Lanard is barred from deposing Michael Kroll (whether by notice or

10

subpoena) unless it obtains an order from this Court expressly permitting Mr. Kroll’s

11

deposition;
3)

12

Any depositions of Knodt, Wokerstorfer, or Shor must be taken at the

13

offices of Faegre Baker Daniels LLP in Minnesota unless this Court orders otherwise;

14

and

15

4)

Prior to any deposition notices or subpoenas for depositions being issued

16

by either party in the action, the parties are required to meet and confer and make

17

reasonable, good-faith efforts to establish a mutually-agreeable date for each

18

deposition.

19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23

Dated: November 7, 2018
Hon. Jean P. Rosenbluth
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING DEPOSITIONS
Case No. 2:17-cv-04472-GW-JPR