Izaz Khan v. Los Angeles Times Newspaper et al
Filing
10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge George H. Wu, re Order to Show Cause, Deadlines 8 . THEREFORE, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. 4 1915. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jm)
FILED
U.S. DISTf
SEP 2 0 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
~~
CASE NUMBER:
IZAZ KHAN,
CV 17-4606 GW(FFM)
PLAINTIFF(S),
V
.
JUDGMENT
(
Failure to Pay Full Filing Fee)
LOS ANGELES TIMES NEWSPAPER,et al.,
DEFENDANT(S).
On
,plaintiff was permitted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, to
June 30, 2017
f the above-referenced action without prepayment of the full filing fee of $350.00, but plaintiff was ordered
ile
to pay to the Clerk of Court the u full filing fee ❑initial partial filing fee.
By Order to Show Cause dated
August 21, 2017
,plaintiff was ordered to
show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for plaintiffs failure to timely pay the
u full filing fee ❑initial partial filing fee. Plaintiff has failed to file a sufficient response to the Order to Show
Cause or pay the❑ full filing fee u inititial partial filing fee within the time allowed.
THEREFORE,IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to
comply with 28 U.S.C. 4 1915.
/s~~~~
Date
United tates istrict Judge
Presented by:
United States Magistrate Judge
IFP-2(03/13)
JUDGMENT (Failure to Pay Full Filing Fee)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?