Daryll Van Snowden v. Stephen A. Cazares et al

Filing 5

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. As plaintiff is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis, has been afforded adequate time to pay the full filing fee and has not done so, and has been cautioned that the failure timely to pay the full filing fee would result in dismissal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (dml)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 DARYLL VAN SNOWDEN, Case No. CV 17-4711 DSF(JC) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN A. CAZARES, et al., Defendants. 16 17 On June 26, 2017, plaintiff, who is at liberty and is proceeding pro se, filed a 18 Complaint and a Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP Request”). On July 19 14, 2017, the Court issued an order denying the IFP Request for the reasons 20 explained therein, directing plaintiff to pay the filing fees in full within 30 days, and 21 advising plaintiff that if he did not pay the filing fees within the foregoing time 22 frame, the case would be dismissed. As plaintiff is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis, has been afforded 23 24 adequate time to pay the full filing fee and has not done so, and has been cautioned 25 that the failure timely to pay the full filing fee would result in dismissal, 26 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 27 DATED: _8/24/17_________ _______________________________________ 28 HONORABLE DALE S. FISCHER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?