Lilia Nuno v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 23

JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. The Complaint is dismissed as to Wells Fargo and NBS LLC, as to all causes of action, with prejudice; 2. Judgment is entered in favor of defendants Wells Fargo and NBS, LLC; and 3. Plaintiff, Lilia Nuno will recover nothing in this action from either defendant Wells Fargo nor NBS, LLC. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (cr)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 LILIA NUNO, an individual; CASE NO.: CV 17-4809-GW(Ex) Plaintiff, 12 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL v. 13 14 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; ABOUT BUCKLEY MADOLE, P.C.; 15 AND DOES 1 THRU 100; [Assigned to the Hon. George H. Wu] Defendants. 16 17 18 On August 24, 2017, the Court entered an Order granting the Motion to 19 20 Dismiss the Complaint, filed by defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 21 successor by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia 22 Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB (“Wells Fargo”) and joined by 23 NBS Default Services, LLC (“NBS, LLC”) (erroneously sued as “About Buckley 24 Madole, P.C.”) dismissing the Complaint in its entirety, without leave to amend. 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 93000/FR2313/01847554-1 1 CASE NO.: CV 17-4809-GW(EX) [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 1 Accordingly: 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 3 1. The Complaint is dismissed as to Wells Fargo and NBS LLC, as to 4 all causes of action, with prejudice; 5 2. Judgment is entered in favor of defendants Wells Fargo and NBS, 6 LLC; and 7 3. Plaintiff, Lilia Nuno will recover nothing in this action from either 8 defendant Wells Fargo nor NBS, LLC. 9 10 DATED: September 13, 2017 HON. GEORGE H. WU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR2313/01847554-1 2 CASE NO.: CV 17-4809-GW(EX) [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to 3 this action. I am employed in the City of Pasadena, California; my business address is Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, 301 N. Lake 4 Ave, Suite 1100 Pasadena, CA 91101-4158 5 On the date below, I served a copy of the foregoing document entitled: 6 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 7 on the interested parties in said case as follows: 8 Served By Means Other than Electronically Via the Court’s CM/ECF System Served Electronically Via the Court’s CM/ECF System Plaintiff, Pro Se Attorneys for Defendant NBS Default Services, LLC: Lilia Nuno 4172 Woodlawn Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90011 Nabeel Zuberi, Esq. BUCKLEY MADOLE, P.C. 301 E. Ocean Dr., Suite 1720 Long Beach, CA 90802 Tel: (323) 273-6437 9 Tel. | Fax: (562) 983-5363 10 11 12 13 14 15 nabeel.zuberi@buckleymadole.com 16 17  18 19 20 BY MAIL: I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence by mailing. Under that same practice it would be deposited with U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage fully prepaid at Pasadena, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 21 I declare under penalty of perjury under 22 America that the foregoing is true and correct. the laws of theI United States of I declare that am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of this Court, at whose direction the service 23 was made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena, California on September 12, 24 2017. 25 26 Carol Goodwin (Type or Print Name) /s/ Carol Goodwin (Signature of Declarant) 27 28 93000/FR2313/01847554-1 CASE NO. 2:17-CV-04809-GW-E CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?