Kevin Briscoe v. Starbucks Corporation et al

Filing 66

JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. BASED ON THE FOREGOING, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiffshall take nothing by way of his Complaint and judgment shall be and hereby isentered in Starbucks favor as to all causes of action and claims asserted against it inthis action.IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ADJUDGED that, as the prevailing party,Starbucks is entitled to apply to recover costs pursuant to Rule 54 of the Federal Rulesof Civil Procedure and Central District Local Rule 54-1, et seq. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
10
11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KEVIN BRISCOE,
Plaintiff,

12
v.

14

STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY;
and DOES 1-20; Inclusive,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JUDGMENT
JS-6

13
15

Case No. 2:17-cv-04832-JAK (JPRx)

Defendants.

1

After full consideration of the papers, evidence, and authorities submitted by

2

the parties and in the Court’s files, as well as the parties’ oral argument thereon, this

3

Court issued an order granting Defendant Starbucks Corporation’s (“Starbucks”)

4

Motion for Summary Judgment, Or In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment

5

(“Motion”) in its entirety as to Plaintiff Kevin Briscoe’s (“Plaintiff”) claims in this

6

action.

7

BASED ON THE FOREGOING, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiff

8

shall take nothing by way of his Complaint and judgment shall be and hereby is

9

entered in Starbucks’ favor as to all causes of action and claims asserted against it in

10

this action.

11

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ADJUDGED that, as the prevailing party,

12

Starbucks is entitled to apply to recover costs pursuant to Rule 54 of the Federal Rules

13

of Civil Procedure and Central District Local Rule 54-1, et seq.

14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: November 7, 2018

JOHN A. KRONSTADT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE