Gene Sigal v. County of Los Angeles et al

Filing 172

JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANTS ANGELA LEE AND CATHY WEINGARTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 120 by Judge R. Gary Klausner. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants ANGELA LEE and CATHY WEINGART have judgment entered in their favor forthwith, that Plaintiffs GENE SIGAL, S.S. and L.S. take nothing, and that the action be dismissed on the merits. It is further ordered and adjudged that Defendants recover their costs. (jp)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Avi Burkwitz, Esq., Bar No.: 217225
[e-mail]
Diana G. Ratcliff, Bar No. 228302
[e-mail]
PETERSON · BRADFORD · BURKWITZ
100 North First Street, Suite 300
Burbank, California 91502
818.562.5800
NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT
Attorneys for Defendants,
ANGELA LEE and CATHY WEINGART

7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
PETERSON · BRADFORD · BURKWITZ
100 North First Street, Suite 300
Burbank, California 91502
818.562.5800

12
13

Plaintiffs,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Case No.: 2:17-CV-04851 RGK (AGRx)
Assigned to the Honorable: R. Gary
Klausner
Courtroom: Roybal, 850-8th Floor

GENE SIGAL, L.S., a minor. and S.S., a
minor. by and through their Guardian Ad
Litem,

vs.

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
ANGELA LEE AND CATHY
WEINGART’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LILIA
MERIN, TASHA BEARD, DORIS
LEMIEUX, PRISCILLA ASHBURN,
ANGELA LEE, CATHY WEINGART,
TAMARA PONCIA, BILLETE
MARTIN. JAMES MARTIN, ROSA
FIGUEROA-VERSAGEIS. Does 1-50

Trial: July 31, 2018
Complaint Filed: April 18, 2017

Defendants.

21
22

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

23

Whereas Defendants ANGELA LEE and CATHY WEINGART filed a

24

Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on all

25

remaining claims against them alleged in Plaintiffs GENE SIGAL, L.S. and S.S.’s

26

Complaint on June 4, 2018;

27

Whereas the aforementioned Motion was taken under submission ahead of the
1

28

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANTS ANGELA LEE
AND CATHY WEINGART’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No.: 2:17-CV-04851 RGK (AGRx)
c:\users\swilliam\appdata\local\temp\notesc7a056\p-proposed judgment re msj.docx

1
2

PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

3

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over

4

the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 100 North

5

First Street, Suite 300, Burbank, California 91502.

6

On May ___, 2018, I served the foregoing document described as:
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANTS ANGELA LEE
AND CATHY WEINGART’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

7
8

on interested parties in this action by placing a true and correct copy thereof

9

enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows:

10
11

SEE ATTACHED MAILING LIST


BY CM/ECF NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING: I electronically filed
document(s) with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system.
Participants in this case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by
the CM/ECF system. Participants in this case who are not registered CM/ECF
users will be served by mail or by other means permitted by the court rules.



BY MAIL: I deposited such envelope in the mail at Burbank, California.
The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. As follows: I
am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing
correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with
U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at
Burbank, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on
motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation
date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for
mailing in affidavit.



BY ELECTRONIC MAIL: I served the enclosed via e-mail transmission to
each of the parties listed on the attached service list with an email address.



FEDERAL: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United
States of America that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am
employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction
the service was made.

PETERSON · BRADFORD · BURKWITZ
100 North First Street, Suite 300
Burbank, California 91502
818.562.5800

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Executed on May ____, 2018 at Burbank, California.

24
25

Tyler DeVito

26
27
3

28

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANTS ANGELA LEE
AND CATHY WEINGART’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No.: 2:17-CV-04851 RGK (AGRx)
c:\users\swilliam\appdata\local\temp\notesc7a056\p-proposed judgment re msj.docx

1
2
3

SERVICE LIST
RE:

Sigal, Gene, et al. v. County of Los Angeles
Case No.:

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Robert Powell, Esq.
Powell & Associates
925 West Hedding St.
San Jose, CA. 95126
T: 408-553-0200
F: 408-553-0203
E: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiffs,
Gene Sigal, L.S. and S.S.

11
PETERSON · BRADFORD · BURKWITZ
100 North First Street, Suite 300
Burbank, California 91502
818.562.5800

12
13
14
15
16
17

Nigel Burns, Esq. (202576)
Brandon L. Wyman, Esq. (279171)
THE LAW OFFICES OF NIGEL BURNS
800 West 1st Street, Suite #401-12
Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants,
TAMARA PONCIA and BILLETE MARTIN

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Rex S. Heinke (SBN 066163)
Jessica M. Weisel (SBN 174809)
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310-229-1001
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant,
Rosa Figueroa-Versage

27
4

28

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANTS ANGELA LEE
AND CATHY WEINGART’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No.: 2:17-CV-04851 RGK (AGRx)
c:\users\swilliam\appdata\local\temp\notesc7a056\p-proposed judgment re msj.docx

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
PETERSON · BRADFORD · BURKWITZ
100 North First Street, Suite 300
Burbank, California 91502
818.562.5800

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
5

28

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANTS ANGELA LEE
AND CATHY WEINGART’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No.: 2:17-CV-04851 RGK (AGRx)
c:\users\swilliam\appdata\local\temp\notesc7a056\p-proposed judgment re msj.docx